Case Fileefta-efta00104700DOJ Data Set 9Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 329 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 1
Unknown1p1 persons
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 329 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 329 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FII.ED: 8/25/21 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defendant submitted a letter on August 18 informing the Court about disruptions of attorney-client video teleconferences. Dkt. No. 319. After conferring with MDC Legal, the Government responded on August 23. Dkt. No. 326. According to the Government and MDC Legal, the Defendant's difficulties in communicating with her counsel via video teleconference have been resolved, and the Government's letter sufficiently addresses her other requests. The Court finds MDC Legal's assurance that Defendant's communications have not been interfered with, recorded, or listened to sufficient. No further application for relief was made in Defendant's August 24 reply. Dkt. No. 327. Th
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.