Case Fileefta-efta00106039DOJ Data Set 9Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 307 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 21
Unknown21p2 persons
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 307 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 307 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to suppress evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena to a law firm involved in earlier civil litigation against her. She contends that because the documents sought by the subpoena were previously subject to a protective order, the Government obtained them in violation of her rights against compelled self-incrimination, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and to due process of law. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes that the evidence should not be suppressed and that Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing. I. Background In late 2015, -sued Maxwell for defamation. See (S.D.N.Y.). alleged that Maxw
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.