Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00108607DOJ Data Set 9Other

FD-759

FD-759 Revised 07-17-2009 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Notification of Authority Granted for Use of Electronic Monitoring EquipmentA - Not Requiring a Court Order Background Information To: Miami Frnm• Miami Date: 10/28/2009 For FBI Field Office Use Only CM*: Contact: A Name A A Enter as much of the name as you know and click Search to find matches. A Phone: Ext: A squad: PB-2 Case File ID: 72-MM-113327 Title Text: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE A A 0 O Consensual Monitoring Other Electronic Surveillance OIA Authority for CHS Are you seeking OIA Authority for a CHS to consensually monitor in a two-party state?A (DO Yes (OIA authority for CHS is only valid for 90 day increments at additional 90 day increments will require submission of another FD-759) A co 0 No (If not OIA, consensual monitoring can be authorized for the duration of the investigation unless the monitoring circumstances substantially change) OIA approval for a CHS sha

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00108607
Pages
3
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

FD-759 Revised 07-17-2009 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Notification of Authority Granted for Use of Electronic Monitoring EquipmentA - Not Requiring a Court Order Background Information To: Miami Frnm• Miami Date: 10/28/2009 For FBI Field Office Use Only CM*: Contact: A Name A A Enter as much of the name as you know and click Search to find matches. A Phone: Ext: A squad: PB-2 Case File ID: 72-MM-113327 Title Text: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE A A 0 O Consensual Monitoring Other Electronic Surveillance OIA Authority for CHS Are you seeking OIA Authority for a CHS to consensually monitor in a two-party state?A (DO Yes (OIA authority for CHS is only valid for 90 day increments at additional 90 day increments will require submission of another FD-759) A co 0 No (If not OIA, consensual monitoring can be authorized for the duration of the investigation unless the monitoring circumstances substantially change) OIA approval for a CHS sha

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
FD-759 Revised 07-17-2009 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Notification of Authority Granted for Use of Electronic Monitoring EquipmentA - Not Requiring a Court Order Background Information To: Miami Frnm• Miami Date: 10/28/2009 For FBI Field Office Use Only CM*: Contact: A Name A A Enter as much of the name as you know and click Search to find matches. A Phone: Ext: A squad: PB-2 Case File ID: 72-MM-113327 Title Text: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE A A 0 O Consensual Monitoring Other Electronic Surveillance OIA Authority for CHS Are you seeking OIA Authority for a CHS to consensually monitor in a two-party state?A (DO Yes (OIA authority for CHS is only valid for 90 day increments at additional 90 day increments will require submission of another FD-759) A co 0 No (If not OIA, consensual monitoring can be authorized for the duration of the investigation unless the monitoring circumstances substantially change) OIA approval for a CHS shall be maintained in the appropriate CHS file with a copy placed in the appropriate ELSUR file.A Investigation Classification Level A 1. Reason for Proposed Use: A Collect Evidence A O Unclassified O Confidential 2. Types of Equipment Telephone Body Recorder CCTV without Audio A 2a. Equipment Concealed: In a Telephone On a Person In a Motel Room 4.A Consenting Party (Identify ONLY on Field Office Copy): rig UCE Protect Identity 3. Interceptee(s): (If Public Official, Include Title and Entity) A Name: Alfredo Rodriguez : A And others yet unknown J 5. Location where monitoring will likely occur: O Secret A Source 4: 4a. The following mandatory requirements have been or will be met prior to Consensual Monitoring taking place: 02, National Security Criminal A $1 Consenting party has agreed to testify; A 0 0 A 41 Recording/transmitting device will be activated only when 0 consenting party is present. •. Duration of proposed use: Consenting party has agreed to execute the consent form prior to monitoring/recording; & EFTA00108607 A Location (City, County or Other) A State Southern District of Florida Florida Will the monitoring occur in the territory of another division? 0 00 A Yes ® No A Location (City, County or Other) A State Will the monitoring occur in the territory of another division? 0 No 7. Chief Division Counsel (CDC)/Office of the General Counsel (OGC) has been contacted, foresees no entrapment, and has advised monitoring is legal & appropriate. 00A Yes O For the duration of investigation O (Including CIA for FBI employees) • 0 For 90 days O (CIA for CMS - renew every 90 days) • b. Check box if verbal authority was obtained. • Name ofA Authorizer: LA • Date of Authorization: A Name: A Telephones: ADate of Contact 10/28/2009 A CDC Review: AA Initials: _ AField Office: Miami A Enter as much of the name as you know and click Search to find matches. Ext: AAAAA Date: 4p0 Enter As much of the name and dick Search 10/28/2009 A . Violations 18 Title: 1509 & 1510 U.S.C: 9. DO) approval isA required if the requested monitoring includes any of the following sensitive circumstances A A (Check all that apply): Monitoring relates to an investigation of a member of Congress, a federal Judge, a member of the Executive Branch at Level IV or above, or a person who has served in such capacity within the previous 2 years. Monitoring relates to an investigation of the Governor, Ueutenant Governor, or Attorney General of any state or territory, or a judge n or justice of the highest court of and State or Territory, and the offense investigated is one involving bribery, conflict of interest, or LI extortion relating to the performance of his/her official duties. p involved or its officers. A 0 Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, or the n U.S. Attorney in the district where an investigation is being conducted has requested the investigating agency obtain prior written consent for making a consensual interception in a specific investigation. 10. Synopsis and predicateA of Case (the synopsis of the investigation should articulate pertinent, timely facts and predication for which the purpose of the consensual monitoring is requested): On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth [DOB REDACTED], was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth [DOB REDACTED]. Edwards is an attorney who is representing four female individuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein. Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed Rodriguez and served him with a federal subpoena to provide any and all documents relating to the case. Rodriguez is trying to sell Edwards documents that he claims are pertinent to the dvil case. Edwards explained to Rodriguez that his demands are illegal and that he was obligated under subpoena to turn the documents over. A Rodriguez is still demanding &50,000.00 for the documents. Edwards will make a consensual call to Rodriguez and introduce an Under Cover Employee (UCE) to complete the transaction. The UCE will call Rodriguez to collect criminal conversation and set up a meeting. UCE will meet with Rodriguez to Consenting/non-consenting party is or has been a member of the Witness Security Program and that fact is known to the agency Consenting/non-consenting party is in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons of the U.S. Marshals Service. Some states, by law, prohibit recordings of conversations or communications without the consent of all parties to the conversation or communication, although under federal law the FBI may undertake these recordings.A Under FBI guidelines, one party consensual recording of communications occurring in these states may be considered "Otherwise Illegal Activity" unless an exception to the prohibition is available for law enforcement activity, including that undertaken by the FBI.A By signature below, the SAC (or designee) approves the consenting party's possible Otherwise Illegal Activity in the event the recording takes place in a state with such a prohibition. EFTA00108608 A 11. Approval/Review: SSA A Signature: Date: A FBIHQ Approval 12. ASAC (If Applicable) A 14. Unit Chief (If Sensitive Circumstances Exist) A Date: A Signature: Date: Signature: 13. SAC (If Applicable) A Signature: Date: Author: A A A A EFTA00108609

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01326116

3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01326054

26p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein house details and alleged MC2 trafficking links

The passage repeats widely reported allegations about Epstein’s activities and mentions known associates (Jean‑Luc Brunel, Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova). It adds a claim that Epstein gave $1 mi Alleged $1 million payment from Epstein to Jean‑Luc Brunel for MC2 startup Former bookkeeper claims MC2‑linked girls were trafficked on Epstein’s private jets Four staff members (Sarah Kellen, Adrian

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Document hints at possible legal maneuvering and undisclosed evidence in Jeffrey Epstein case

The passage mentions high‑profile lawyers (Dershowitz, Ken Starr), potential undisclosed journal/calendar, and a pattern of negotiated plea deals that could reveal new evidence or financial flows. Whi Reference to a possible journal or calendar being sold by Epstein’s butler, Alfredo Rodriguez. Mentions involvement of high‑profile attorneys (Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr) and crisis‑management fi All

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01402237

NAME SEARCHED: Darren Indyke PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: RDC PC

79p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.