FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Title: (U) ON OR ABOUT AUGUST OF 2009, BRADLEY Date: 10/27/2009 JAMES EDWARDS, DATE OF B Drafted By: Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (U) RODRIGUEZ, ALFREDO - SEE SUB Details: in Date: 10/28/2009 To: MM From: MM Contact: MM Case ID #: 72-MM-113327-ELA 72-MM-113327-ELA On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth Edwards is an attorney who is representing four female individuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein, Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed Rodriguez and served him with a federal subpoena to provide any and all documents relating to the case. Rodriguez is trying to sell Edwards documents that he claims EFTA00108649 Title: (U) ON OR ABOUT AUGUST OF 2009, BRADLEY JAMES EDWARDS, DATE OF B Re: 72-MM-113327, 10/27/2009 are pertinent to the civil case. Edwards explained to Rodriguez that his demands are illegal and that he was obligated under the
Summary
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Title: (U) ON OR ABOUT AUGUST OF 2009, BRADLEY Date: 10/27/2009 JAMES EDWARDS, DATE OF B Drafted By: Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (U) RODRIGUEZ, ALFREDO - SEE SUB Details: in Date: 10/28/2009 To: MM From: MM Contact: MM Case ID #: 72-MM-113327-ELA 72-MM-113327-ELA On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth Edwards is an attorney who is representing four female individuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein, Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed Rodriguez and served him with a federal subpoena to provide any and all documents relating to the case. Rodriguez is trying to sell Edwards documents that he claims EFTA00108649 Title: (U) ON OR ABOUT AUGUST OF 2009, BRADLEY JAMES EDWARDS, DATE OF B Re: 72-MM-113327, 10/27/2009 are pertinent to the civil case. Edwards explained to Rodriguez that his demands are illegal and that he was obligated under the
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
5618337517Related Documents (6)
Case 09-34791-RBR
EFTA02729648
EFTA01326054
Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires
The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING CO-CONSPIRATOR IMMUNITY PROVISION AND RELATED SUBJECTS COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce within 30 days the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE 99) directing discovery in this case, the Court's Order denying the Government's motion to dismiss and lifting stay of discovery (DE 189), the Court's Omnibus Order (DE 190), and the Court's Order Denying Motion to Join (DE 324): BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have repeatedly asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in thi
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.