From: "
From: " < To: " < Subject: Re: grapes Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:12:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: TEXT.htm D is so ridiculous lol. that's herjob. that's why M asks whoever saw the person for the SRA or whatever to do the disciplinary report. it seems like the reason he needs the report is because he received an incident report while on SW, or went to SW right after. we always do them in those cases, even for people who are not high care levels or forensics. the issue is a matter of the reported suicidality. all she needs to do is write what he said about the incident, and her opinion about it. if he shows no signs of memory loss or cause for concern, he's competent. she's not making a judgment on whether he's guilty of the infraction. she's just stating whether he's in his right mind to go through the process. isn't this part of her job as a psychologist lol?? or, if she really feels like she doesn't know, then that's what she should say in the report. i feel li
Summary
From: " < To: " < Subject: Re: grapes Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:12:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: TEXT.htm D is so ridiculous lol. that's herjob. that's why M asks whoever saw the person for the SRA or whatever to do the disciplinary report. it seems like the reason he needs the report is because he received an incident report while on SW, or went to SW right after. we always do them in those cases, even for people who are not high care levels or forensics. the issue is a matter of the reported suicidality. all she needs to do is write what he said about the incident, and her opinion about it. if he shows no signs of memory loss or cause for concern, he's competent. she's not making a judgment on whether he's guilty of the infraction. she's just stating whether he's in his right mind to go through the process. isn't this part of her job as a psychologist lol?? or, if she really feels like she doesn't know, then that's what she should say in the report. i feel li
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.