From: "/O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP

From: "/O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP S/CN=72708F8BC5354F44958B87907FFOBCDB To: Cc: Subject: Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 00:22:11 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Interview of _ pdf AUL" Ok sorry for the delay. For there is only the attachment; no notes were taken for the 302 authored Yes, the 302 regardin= just the short notes along with the invoice. There were no notes fora I apologize for the confusion in labeling that attached. Ok I figured out thMconfusion. The terview is attached because he was present for the interview lected in the 302. sent. l-nay, may ]. , ZULU SU/ Pm listed at the top Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes This is really helpful, and I think we're down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications — Fo ), I don't think we received notes from 7/6/19 — the attachments included a copy of her ID but not any writing. It's possible there weren't other written notes — the 302, attached, is very short — but just let us know either way? Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for are just the short contact info notes, with his attorney info and a property invoice — both the notes and the 302 are a ached for reference. I think that's right but just want to confirm. I also didn't see notes foe though let us know if it's in a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise missed it, that's also totally possible. And lust a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as' which I assume is It also has the nam (?) at the top, which maybe where that confusion comes from — I know you were looking into that. I think both those names just show up on that one doc. Also totally happy to chat via phone if that's easiest to run through these. Thanks again! EFTA00153838 Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 13:47 Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes Hi all, I've attached the notes you've requested. I've also attaches 02 and notes; that interview was not in the batch we gave you. You'll see below where I've typed "attached" to reflect w at notes we have. Interviews where this is not written simply meant there were no notes to attach likely because the interview/contact was brief (I double checked all to be sure). Let me know if there is anything else you come across that we've missed sending. Also, could you send over the notes from the last two phone interviews with we have them on our end. Thanks, From Sent: nay, ay , : Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes Just want to make sure Thanks very much again for getting us so many 302s recently, we really appreciate it. Collectively, there have been more than 120 interviews in this case, which is incredible. We've now completed a full review and cross-reference of all our materials, so wanted to address a handful of loose ends. In terms of reports, I think currently we're down to only missing three, all of which we have interview notes for but no 302s: And then there are a larger number of interviews where we have a 302 but not hand-written notes. My guess is that for some of these, and possibly most, there aren't notes because the "interviews" were so short that they just got typed up, but we wanted to check. Also most of them were interviews conducted by other agents (where it was agents other than one or both of you, I've indicated below). But if you could please double check to see if there are interview notes for the following, and in particular the few that are in bold? And let us know if any questions or issues. They are: EFTA00153839 Thanks again! EFTA00153840