Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00155163DOJ Data Set 9Other

To: Cindy Hopkins

From: To: Cindy Hopkins Cc: usdoj.gov>, "Rohrbach, Andrew ( U SAN YS)" <Andrew. Rohrbach@ usdoj.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Sunpoena Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:28:13 +0000 Importance: Normal Good afternoon, Thank you very much for reaching out. I will call you at the number you provided as soon as I am out of meetings for the day. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York From: Cindy Hopkins < Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 2:26 PM To: Subject: Sunpoena Hi this is Cindy Hopkins responding to your subpoena in the US vs Maxwell case. Please contact me at t your convenience. EFTA00155163

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00155163
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Cindy Hopkins Cc: usdoj.gov>, "Rohrbach, Andrew ( U SAN YS)" <Andrew. Rohrbach@ usdoj.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Sunpoena Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:28:13 +0000 Importance: Normal Good afternoon, Thank you very much for reaching out. I will call you at the number you provided as soon as I am out of meetings for the day. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York From: Cindy Hopkins < Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 2:26 PM To: Subject: Sunpoena Hi this is Cindy Hopkins responding to your subpoena in the US vs Maxwell case. Please contact me at t your convenience. EFTA00155163

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cindy Hopkins Cc: usdoj.gov>, "Rohrbach, Andrew ( U SAN YS)" <Andrew. Rohrbach@ usdoj.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Sunpoena Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:28:13 +0000 Importance: Normal Good afternoon, Thank you very much for reaching out. I will call you at the number you provided as soon as I am out of meetings for the day. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York From: Cindy Hopkins < Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 2:26 PM To: Subject: Sunpoena Hi this is Cindy Hopkins responding to your subpoena in the US vs Maxwell case. Please contact me at t your convenience. EFTA00155163

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainusdoj.gov

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 650

The United States Attorney's office requests that the court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from April 1, 2022, to April 22, 2022, due to pending post-trial motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense counsel consents to this request. The court had previously excluded time through April 1, 2022, to allow the parties to research and brief post-trial motions.

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01660663

3p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Notice of Electronic Filing: 21-2

The document is a notice of electronic filing from the US District Court, Southern District of New York, indicating that the appeal record in USA v. Maxwell has been transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. It includes details about the case, the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, and the attorneys involved. The case involves charges of conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts, among others.

24p
Court UnsealedIndictmentUnknown

Motion Information Statement: 22-1426, Document 14

Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, is seeking to be relieved as continued counsel on appeal in the case USA v. MAXWELL. The motion is being opposed by the U.S. Attorney's office. The appeal originates from a decision by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the SDNY.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 306

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, stating that the parties in the Ghislaine Maxwell case do not propose any redactions to the court's June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order or certain exhibits. The parties have no objection to the public filing of these documents without redactions.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01334722

17p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.