Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00157942DOJ Data Set 9Other

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 172 Entered on FLSD Docket 12)18/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN am Defendants. JOINT NOTICE OF RF,SOLUTION/SETTLEMENT Plaintiff, and Defendant(s), JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, jointly give Notice to the Court that the Panics have resolved the above-styled action. The Parties further stipulate that all pending Motions are moot and no further Court action is required. The Parties are in the process of finalizing the settlement and will file a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Proposed Order upon completing all documents related to the agreed resolution/settlement. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00157942
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 172 Entered on FLSD Docket 12)18/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN am Defendants. JOINT NOTICE OF RF,SOLUTION/SETTLEMENT Plaintiff, and Defendant(s), JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, jointly give Notice to the Court that the Panics have resolved the above-styled action. The Parties further stipulate that all pending Motions are moot and no further Court action is required. The Parties are in the process of finalizing the settlement and will file a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Proposed Order upon completing all documents related to the agreed resolution/settlement. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 172 Entered on FLSD Docket 12)18/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN am Defendants. JOINT NOTICE OF RF,SOLUTION/SETTLEMENT Plaintiff, and Defendant(s), JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, jointly give Notice to the Court that the Panics have resolved the above-styled action. The Parties further stipulate that all pending Motions are moot and no further Court action is required. The Parties are in the process of finalizing the settlement and will file a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Proposed Order upon completing all documents related to the agreed resolution/settlement. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this le day of December 2009 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 3505-049 Page I of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005590 EFTA00157942 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 172 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2009 Page 2 of 2 =v. Epstein, at al. Page 2 Counsel for Plaintiff Co-Counsel for Plaintiff ounce or a en ant c rcy cm Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. ounce or ae cn• an Respectfully submitted, By: Js! Robert D. Critton. Jr. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 Florida Bar /1617296 & COLEMAN (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) 3505-049 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005591 EFTA00157943

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80811-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

0338E903Etek.888893941AAAA ODCIKNOM03712 En

0338E903Etek.888893941AAAA ODCIKNOM03712 En 1'€10 ikaPRPFAftikW54/4/(1809 Pander)! !24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants, Defendant. Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedinas With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, dated December 16, 2008, (Document 28), in which this

24p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, (DE 33), in which this Court denied a motion for stay brought by Def

56p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

#291874/mep

11p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02728984

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.