niabUSI
From: abaS1 To: Cc: niabUSI Subject RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); lane Doe v. Indyke et al., SONY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-3GIODCF Date: Monday, August 3, 2020 11:58:24 PM Mr- The password for the production file I just sent you is Please let me know if you have any issues opening the file. Thank you, From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 12:33 AM To: Cc: < EM> (USANYS) —. < O> Subject: Re: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SONY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Mr- Thank you for checking in. I hope to be able to follow up soon. Thanks, On Jun 26, 2020, at 12:49 AM, > wrote: Mr. a, I am following up on my client's request. It would mean a lot for your office to do what it can to see that her request is complied with in an expedient manner. Thank you. On Jun 8, 2020, at 4:19 PM, (USANYS) > wrote: 3509-019 Page I of 3 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7,
Summary
From: abaS1 To: Cc: niabUSI Subject RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); lane Doe v. Indyke et al., SONY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-3GIODCF Date: Monday, August 3, 2020 11:58:24 PM Mr- The password for the production file I just sent you is Please let me know if you have any issues opening the file. Thank you, From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 12:33 AM To: Cc: < EM> (USANYS) —. < O> Subject: Re: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SONY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Mr- Thank you for checking in. I hope to be able to follow up soon. Thanks, On Jun 26, 2020, at 12:49 AM, > wrote: Mr. a, I am following up on my client's request. It would mean a lot for your office to do what it can to see that her request is complied with in an expedient manner. Thank you. On Jun 8, 2020, at 4:19 PM, (USANYS) > wrote: 3509-019 Page I of 3 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7,
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
1:20-CV-004841:20-CV-00484-JGKRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.