Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00163544DOJ Data Set 9Other

u jec : ' e:

u jec : ' e: eques or T1 eos Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:09:37 +0000 Importance: Normal I asked WFO, who has the originals to double check but what I produced is what I received from them Fro Sent: Monday. July 7.2025 2:03:02 PM Subject: RE: Request for Videos DOJ posted the 2 videos (see the embedded memo in the news article: The Director just called and advised media is reporting there is a 1-minute omission of footage which I've just confirmed at the 11:58:58 mark on both original and enhanced videos. Both go from 11:58:58 to 12:00:00 so a gap of footage for 1 minute and 2 seconds. Can you please confirm the original NY MCC video footage does/does not include this gap or if in conversion, somehow the gap in footage can be explained? Priority asap within the hour, as if we need to replace video links, we will need to send to DOJ to update the links. If the gap is explained as appearing in the original footage from MCC, was there any reason for this? Thank you in advanc

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00163544
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

u jec : ' e: eques or T1 eos Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:09:37 +0000 Importance: Normal I asked WFO, who has the originals to double check but what I produced is what I received from them Fro Sent: Monday. July 7.2025 2:03:02 PM Subject: RE: Request for Videos DOJ posted the 2 videos (see the embedded memo in the news article: The Director just called and advised media is reporting there is a 1-minute omission of footage which I've just confirmed at the 11:58:58 mark on both original and enhanced videos. Both go from 11:58:58 to 12:00:00 so a gap of footage for 1 minute and 2 seconds. Can you please confirm the original NY MCC video footage does/does not include this gap or if in conversion, somehow the gap in footage can be explained? Priority asap within the hour, as if we need to replace video links, we will need to send to DOJ to update the links. If the gap is explained as appearing in the original footage from MCC, was there any reason for this? Thank you in advanc

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
u jec : ' e: eques or T1 eos Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:09:37 +0000 Importance: Normal I asked WFO, who has the originals to double check but what I produced is what I received from them Fro Sent: Monday. July 7.2025 2:03:02 PM Subject: RE: Request for Videos DOJ posted the 2 videos (see the embedded memo in the news article: The Director just called and advised media is reporting there is a 1-minute omission of footage which I've just confirmed at the 11:58:58 mark on both original and enhanced videos. Both go from 11:58:58 to 12:00:00 so a gap of footage for 1 minute and 2 seconds. Can you please confirm the original NY MCC video footage does/does not include this gap or if in conversion, somehow the gap in footage can be explained? Priority asap within the hour, as if we need to replace video links, we will need to send to DOJ to update the links. If the gap is explained as appearing in the original footage from MCC, was there any reason for this? Thank you in advance for immediate attention. EFTA00163544 Sent: Thursday, July 3 2025 2:40 PM Subject: Request for Videos In the below forwarded email you can download the videos using this password. The link is good for 7 days. Happy 4th of July! Subject: Fw: Data Has Been Shared With You Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2025 2:29 PM Subject: Data Has Been Shared With You [X] Your data is ready! EFTA00163545 W below, if you need any further assistance please reach out to Do not reply to this email For more assistance email dcap-helpdesk@fbi.go EFTA00163546

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emaildcap-helpdesk@fbi.go

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.