Post-NPA Timeline
Post-NPA Timeline 9/24/2007 NPA signed 10/2007 Additional negotiations regarding selection of Special Master 10/2007 JD# I Notified regarding signing of NPA 10/2007 Investigation continues to try to identify addl victims. (As shown below, investigation continues through March 2008.) 10/2/2007 Addil client of interviewed. She refuses to provide information. (She provides information on a later date). 12/10/07 (approx.) Contacted counsel for JD#2 (paid for by Epstein) to determine if he still represented JD#2 and whether he should receive upcoming victim notification 12/11/07 Epstein counsel object to inclusion of JD#2 as "victim" and begin their appeals to Washington, DC Revised indictment package finalized Email regarding add'I investigative steps to be taken Add'l grand jury subpoenas prepared and served Revised indictment package signed Responses to add'I grand jury subpoenas received Planned grand jury presentation (moved to 4/15/2008 then to 4/29/2008) ompl
Summary
Post-NPA Timeline 9/24/2007 NPA signed 10/2007 Additional negotiations regarding selection of Special Master 10/2007 JD# I Notified regarding signing of NPA 10/2007 Investigation continues to try to identify addl victims. (As shown below, investigation continues through March 2008.) 10/2/2007 Addil client of interviewed. She refuses to provide information. (She provides information on a later date). 12/10/07 (approx.) Contacted counsel for JD#2 (paid for by Epstein) to determine if he still represented JD#2 and whether he should receive upcoming victim notification 12/11/07 Epstein counsel object to inclusion of JD#2 as "victim" and begin their appeals to Washington, DC Revised indictment package finalized Email regarding add'I investigative steps to be taken Add'l grand jury subpoenas prepared and served Revised indictment package signed Responses to add'I grand jury subpoenas received Planned grand jury presentation (moved to 4/15/2008 then to 4/29/2008) ompl
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80736-KAMRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.