Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00192825DOJ Data Set 9Other

015A PAW t-intiV re__ Pr

015A PAW t-intiV re__ Pr EFTA00192825 It a)* " 1-°- ermi F Acer_447-42",-- ti-eintrtzeieit4`tgzikti cAte._ _c≥citin-milorkficalio\-n _____,Ky- vidYeLoc -hd- I iMdtfj- 415 octeasi4 coo_ b_- airaidynd_ -.[€-* sae- ole-4asi_co2 tActaiek- J:_e k;-cow,i1 ini2to,sittrudin '0 _LO-- name_z_atnar /-1,6 elio a_ (sit rA ,,v,"atat., _yz4__er.ae , We frizaLth_takii it/IK iekt .Med_a_ted.etact .ir_tt a/42f unr vick,s_, _tuff° d pc'iwiii nsclial<7-4 Aciasea, ' ca-at a -;? 41) lent 4.aletds, _oil . I astai ..._. __ -2met-A.1 e . . .. / will pi a_ if___ ---)-- - - - _tat ma ofitstiti,,t.. e„ mSattw EFTA00192826 . \c' '' ',3cLrt:i n erggc:jur \3ue" Hi‘ f" \ cv-0 Into co -cct.P‘,0,1 ISC._tut_ipLArtift an niklilv, fineuthY4 kik _arf.V.-krtu_A -- he kt..(ilislisPeriTketisALsTaili ____./ 2_ ----- cfa-:_courgi ------ - -------------_------__ _ . _ __ _____ _ __ Isstm • re w _Lhi_ eity LLt_901.4-t fcm_k- +kJ -is-cut ' or rein Rlo tyl _ _____ .__TA.

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00192825
Pages
10
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

015A PAW t-intiV re__ Pr EFTA00192825 It a)* " 1-°- ermi F Acer_447-42",-- ti-eintrtzeieit4`tgzikti cAte._ _c≥citin-milorkficalio\-n _____,Ky- vidYeLoc -hd- I iMdtfj- 415 octeasi4 coo_ b_- airaidynd_ -.[€-* sae- ole-4asi_co2 tActaiek- J:_e k;-cow,i1 ini2to,sittrudin '0 _LO-- name_z_atnar /-1,6 elio a_ (sit rA ,,v,"atat., _yz4__er.ae , We frizaLth_takii it/IK iekt .Med_a_ted.etact .ir_tt a/42f unr vick,s_, _tuff° d pc'iwiii nsclial<7-4 Aciasea, ' ca-at a -;? 41) lent 4.aletds, _oil . I astai ..._. __ -2met-A.1 e . . .. / will pi a_ if___ ---)-- - - - _tat ma ofitstiti,,t.. e„ mSattw EFTA00192826 . \c' '' ',3cLrt:i n erggc:jur \3ue" Hi‘ f" \ cv-0 Into co -cct.P‘,0,1 ISC._tut_ipLArtift an niklilv, fineuthY4 kik _arf.V.-krtu_A -- he kt..(ilislisPeriTketisALsTaili ____./ 2_ ----- cfa-:_courgi ------ - -------------_------__ _ . _ __ _____ _ __ Isstm • re w _Lhi_ eity LLt_901.4-t fcm_k- +kJ -is-cut ' or rein Rlo tyl _ _____ .__TA.

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
015A PAW t-intiV re__ Pr EFTA00192825 It a)* " 1-°- ermi F Acer_447-42",-- ti-eintrtzeieit4`tgzikti cAte._ _c≥citin-milorkficalio\-n _____,Ky- vidYeLoc -hd- I iMdtfj- 415 octeasi4 coo_ b_- airaidynd_ -.[€-* sae- ole-4asi_co2 tActaiek- J:_e k;-cow,i1 ini2to,sittrudin '0 _LO-- name_z_atnar /-1,6 elio a_ (sit rA ,,v,"atat., _yz4__er.ae , We frizaLth_takii it/IK iekt .Med_a_ted.etact .ir_tt a/42f unr vick,s_, _tuff° d pc'iwiii nsclial<7-4 Aciasea, ' ca-at a -;? 41) lent 4.aletds, _oil . I astai ..._. __ -2met-A.1 e . . .. / will pi a_ if___ ---)-- - - - _tat ma ofitstiti,,t.. e„ mSattw EFTA00192826 . \c' '' ',3cLrt:i n erggc:jur \3ue" Hi‘ f" \ cv-0 Into co -cct.P‘,0,1 ISC._tut_ipLArtift an niklilv, fineuthY4 kik _arf.V.-krtu_A -- he kt..(ilislisPeriTketisALsTaili ____./ 2_ ----- cfa-:_courgi ------ - -------------_------__ _ . _ __ _____ _ __ Isstm • re w _Lhi_ eity LLt_901.4-t fcm_k- +kJ -is-cut ' or rein Rlo tyl _ _____ .__TA.N.loc_ih(\______L-szivt. Ucl. in -1-kt civil st.xk.fs ocreinest Vse, Cos4Ci, ; d 4f-\w.1" nexyhey.411 aogotit i 4-0.1 lam' prisms ju-en 14. CI:katik-k War. ea.,,_ i. Lze_ lukaybro, O1/4 cant uproetka onicadmitAt-g- . -- - --- -- ------ ------ ---- -------- -- — EFTA00192827 .08/18/2008 17:40 FAX gh 002/003 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP ANti Jay P. Letkowilz. P.C. To Coll Woke °weeny* (212) 446.4970 Sakovnizttkokiana.coni WA FACSIMILE (561) 820-8777 lice01.10 Cnnlor 163 EOM 6.3rd SOOOI Now York. Now York 10022-4611 (312) 446-4300 WWW.Silthlond corn August 111, 2009 A. Marie ViIlalana United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida MX) South Australian Avenue. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Marie: a rcsmokt: )14$.4900 1 write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution portion of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement"). Thank you for confirming our position that the December modification proposal is not part of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S. Attorney Acosta in his December 19.2007 letter, the unorthodox use of a civil restitution 'statute in a federal plea agreement, which resulted in state charges against Mr. Epstein. has caused several miscommunications with respect to the implementation of the terms of that Agreement. in order to avoid any further miscommunications and to ensure that the IS U.S.C. § 2255 aspects of the Agreement are carried out in a proper manner. it would he useful to come to an agreement as to the implementation of the civil restitution portion of the Agreement. As we have previously stated. Mr. Epstein Atli," intends to abide by the terms of the Agreement, and we hope you appreciate that our efforts to resolve any misunderstandings between Mr. Epstein and the government about the terms of the Agreement are intended only to ensure that it is carried out IhIly and fairly. In an elibrt to avoid having either party unintentionally breach the Agreement. we suggest that steps be taken to clarify the meaning of paragraphs 7-10. It would he extremely helpftd to both sides to have an independent third party consider the Agreement and offer the final word on how certain ii IC i s should be interpreted and satisfied. Because the government has already enlisted Judge to select the attorney representative under the Agreement, we would be amenable to his serving in this role. In order to come to an agreement on the exact procedure by which the identified individuals will obtain restitution. I am providing you with our thoughts on three issues below. Chicago Hong Kong London l.rn Angolan Munldi $an Francisco Waahingtbn. D,C, EFTA00192828 08/18/2008 17:40 FAX aim/003 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LIT A. Marie Villafana August 18. 2008 Page 2 Once we come to an agreement on the following and you provide a complete and final list of identified individuals. it will be appropriate to notify them. First. L am concerned by your suggestion that you might want to increase the number of individuals on the government's list. I had expected the number to have become smaller, because when we spoke prior to signing the agreement, you told me that the government already had a list, and we were informed thereafter that the September 24. 2007 list had been narrowed. Certainly. anyone who was not on the list prior to September 24. 2007 cannot permissibly he added to the list. Second. we will cooperate with the government to reach to an agreement as to substance of the notification to be sent to the government's list of individuals. Based on the Agreement. the information contained in the notification should he limited to (I) the language provided in the Agreement dealing with civil restitution (paragraphs 7-10) and (2) the contact information of the selected attorney representative. We object to the inclusion or additional information about the investigation of Mr. Epstein, the terms of the Agreement other than paragraphs 7-10. and the identity of other identified individuals. Third, as you are aware. the Addendum requires that "the parties will jointly prepare a short written submission to the independent third-party regarding the role of the attorney representative and regarding Epstein's Agreement to pay such attorney representative his or her customary hourly rate for representing such victims subject to the provisions of Paragraph C. infra." We will certainly cooperate with the government to draft such a joint submission and would be pleased to submit draft language to you for such &joint submission. I look forward to working with you to resolve these matters. 1 believe we have a mutual interest in moving past all or these issues so that the civil restitution aspects of the Agreement can be fulfilled. Sincerely. aW te I.elkowuz cc: Karen Atkinson. Chief. Nonhern Division EFTA00192829 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP APIA AiintAll Is rAcleartmtric Jay P. Leikowilz, P.C. To Cad Wolof °Morily Ialkwwlitrlurkland.conl VIA If/WSJMILK (561)1420-8777 Citigroup Cantor 153 Emu 03rd Slrooi Now York, Now York 10022.4011 Poc.surrile: (212) 444-4000 I ) o4G-4900 WWW.kl(kitUln COT August IS, 2008 A. Marie Villalbna United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue. Suite 401) West [calm Beach, Florida 33401 . lie: ./qtrrcy Rpsich: Deer Marie: I write in response to your letter dated August }5; 2(108 regamlirtg *the civil 'restitution .......4.001.11011110.be..1,gfettft ttattwutiorvAgicsinisa (the ..!Afeenien1")...,:fluolic.304ii-for4OttLirissi!Ig • Tint • • _.,. .,.. ourposition at thc-Deeember m . is not part of ihe.Agieement. As expressed by 11.S. Attorney Acosta in his December. 19.2007 loner, the unorthodox use of a eiVitreatitUtion 'statute in a federal plea agreinient which readied in state charges ttgainst•Mr. Epstein..has caused several miscommunications with respect to the implementation of the terms of that Agreement. in order to avoid any further miscommunications and to ensure that the IS U.S.C. § 2255 aspects of the. Agmaineni are carried out in a proper Manner. it would be useful to come to 4n; 4grepittinlksk#-:$4)4:ifIllilFtnPOIntion of the civil ros.04010,11./44_104.k 91 the Agreement, As 144.4*PPONIPIAY.:10,44: 4*. iblly intends To abirleltIkeAdns. Of he Agreernent, nfitd SA! 'avoiscitioiikm bur enbris to resolve any M NAM*, OT..1700601 • 'and the govenatikg.tinHatfitrit Vie terms or the Agreement are intended. Only to ensure that it is carried (awfully and fairly. in art eflbrt to • avoid having either party unintentionally Entach the. Agreement. we suggest that steps be taken to clarify the meanhig of paragraphs 7-10. It would he .eitremely • hetlpful to both sides in, have an independent thlid party. consider. Agreeniem and-offcl the finatmord OIi how win* elduRes shdtdd be InterPreied and siditfled: liveause th&itmiertiment. has already enlisted ;tat; Davis to 'Select the attorney repreSeltiatiye under the Agmeincni. We. would be amenable lo his serving in this role. In order to come to on agreeMent on .the exact procedure by whieb Idenutiud individuals will obtain restitution; I am•providing you with our thoughts on diree.iasues below. . CeICSOck Hong Kong London Los Angolos Munich -Snn Francesco W$shrnglixl, D.C. EFTA00192830 1~vv %if UV %I KIRKLAND. & ELLIS LLP A. Marie Villafana August 13.3008 Page 2 Once we come to an agreement on the (*lowing and you provide a complete and final list of identified individuals, it will be appropriate maytify them. First. I am concerned by your suggestion that you might want Jo increase the number of individuals. on the. government's list. I had expected the ;number to have become smaller, because when we spoke prior to signing the agreement. you told me that the government already - had a list, and we were informed thereafter that the September 24. 7.007 list hod been narrowed. Certainly, anyone who was not on the list prior. to September 24, 2007 cannot' pennissibiy he added to the list. . . . Second, we will cooperate with the govcinntent to reach to an agreement as to Substance*. of the notification to be sent to the government's list of individuals: Rused on the Agreement. the infortnation contained in the notification should he limited to (I y the language provided in the Agreement dealing with civil reStltutionfparagraphs 7-10) and (2):the contact inf0rmation of the selected attorney representative. We object to the inelusion of additional information about. the . investigation of Mr. limteins.tlic tarns of the Agreement other than paragraphs 'M 0. and the identity of atter identified individuals. Third, as •y0u are aware, the Addengitt ires that ."the parties El jointly prepare i:100106fri i lig iltt• MIE: of um -attbini• .* representative and.regarding lipstein:s. Agreement to pay such attorney representative his or her customary hourly amt .for representinisuch victims subject to the provisions of Paragraph' C, itifta." We will certainly cooperate with the government to draft Stich joint•submisidon atx1 • would he pleased to sahrnit draft langtiage to you for such a joint subinIsSion. U bolt forward to working with.ythi tit meolvc.these matters. I believe we have a monad ptiectxst•jitmoving•pnat all of thesit :issues so thpptha.eivil rotitution aspects sf dte AVek•utie* 1404 Sincerely. • 'PM I Leant tx te:' Karen Alkingen, Chief.. Northern I )ivision EFTA00192831 quvwsgwvw KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Fax Transmittal Cit'group Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, -4611 Phon Fax Pleas* notify us immediately if any pages arc not received. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS CONFIDENTIAL. MAY BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT.PRIVILEGED, MAY CONSTITUTE INSIDE INFORMATION. AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. UNAUTHORIZED USE, DISCLOSURE OR COPYING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NO= US IMMEDIATELY AT: IM) 446-4800. irct Company: . Fax It: Direct #: A. Mark Vitkfana CC: " United States Attorney's Office Company: 561-8204777 Fax 12: 561-209-1047 • Direct*: Karen Alkinsnn United States Attorney's Office 5614E-217.7 Date: Pagestobavec Farr*: Direct*: AngtiSt.:13.260S 1.1404460: ... 2 +16e417.0— torovis.afg EFTA00192832 Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11:55 AM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: RE: New proposed response to Jay How about a slightly different version: Thank you for your response. Our communications with Roy Black and later with you were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. We appreciate your answering our question with finality. You have now made clear that Mr. Epstein did not accept the December modification, and accordingly, we will now consider that modification to be a nullity. Pursuant to our Agreement, I will prepare an Amended Notification that contains the name of additional identified victims. In accordance with Paragraph 7B, please provide me with a proposed written submission to the Special Master by Monday afternoon. Finally, as you are aware, yhe United States has been ordered to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement. In accordance with that Order, we will produce the September Agreement with the October Addendum signed by your client. We understand that Mr. Goldberg may not have provided the state court with a true copy of the complete Agreement, and he should take steps to correct that error. From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11:42 AM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: New proposed response to Jay Dear Jay: Thank you for your response. Our communications with Roy Black and later with you were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. You have now made clear that Mr. Epstein did not accept the December modification and does not intend to perform the obligations set'forth therein. The Office is not going to continue negotiating the terms of the Agreement. We only sought finality and you have answered our question. Accordingly, the December proposed modification is hereby withdrawn. The United States has been ordered to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement and, in accordance with that Order, will produce the September Agreement with the October Addendum signed by your client. Mr. Goldberger should be advised that we understand he has not provided the state court with a true copy of the complete Agreement, and he should take steps to correct that error. I will prepare an Amended Notification that contains the name of additional identified victims and will provide that to you promptly. In accordance with Paragraph 7B of the Agreement, please provide me with a proposed written submission to the Special Master by Monday afternoon. We will expect a showing of good faith in the selection of the EFTA00192833 attorney representative and all other terms of the Agreement and excessive delays, like those that have occurred in the past, will be considered a breach of that duty of good faith. Sincerely, A. Marie Villafaha Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 2 EFTA00192834

Technical Artifacts (12)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

FaxFACSIMILE (561) 820-8777
FaxFax 561 820-8777
Phone(212) 444-4000
Phone(212) 446.4970
Phone(312) 446-4300
Phone(561) 820-8777
Phone(561)1420
Phone446-4800
Phone561 209-1047
Phone561 820-8777
Phone561-209-1047
Phone561-8204777

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 5:04 PM To: Menchel, Matthew (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein I just received a call from the FBI telling me that Vanity Fair is sniffing around again. The reporter is a former detective. He told the FBI agent that his sources tell him "the State has been bought off," and asked if our investigation had been sent to "the circular file." Nesbitt responded, "All I can tell you is that we have an open investigation." On another note, I am going to see the grand jury tomorrow and I anticipate a number of questions regarding the status of the indictment. I'm not sure what, if anything, I can tell them. And I did not hear back regarding making changes to the indictment. Can I get some feedback on that? Thank you. A. Marie Villafana Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL

651p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 2

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: I I I I a EFTA00209306 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIF

16p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.