Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00204625DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marrallohnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UNITED STATES Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' REQUEST FOR NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AND REPORT OF INTERVIEW Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Petitioners' Request for Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview, and states: In their Response to Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing and Motion for Production of Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview (D.E. 19), petitioners seek an order compelling the Government to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 19 at 11-13), and the Report of Interview with Jane Doe # 1 (D.E. 19 at 13-14). The Government is unable to voluntarily produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement because the Agreement contains a clause where the parties expressed their anticipati

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00204625
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity

Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marrallohnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UNITED STATES Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' REQUEST FOR NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AND REPORT OF INTERVIEW Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Petitioners' Request for Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview, and states: In their Response to Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing and Motion for Production of Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview (D.E. 19), petitioners seek an order compelling the Government to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 19 at 11-13), and the Report of Interview with Jane Doe # 1 (D.E. 19 at 13-14). The Government is unable to voluntarily produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement because the Agreement contains a clause where the parties expressed their anticipati

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marrallohnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UNITED STATES Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' REQUEST FOR NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AND REPORT OF INTERVIEW Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Petitioners' Request for Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview, and states: In their Response to Government's Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing and Motion for Production of Non-Prosecution Agreement and Report of Interview (D.E. 19), petitioners seek an order compelling the Government to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein (D.E. 19 at 11-13), and the Report of Interview with Jane Doe # 1 (D.E. 19 at 13-14). The Government is unable to voluntarily produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement because the Agreement contains a clause where the parties expressed their anticipation that the Agreement would not be made part of any public record. The Government believes this clause in the Agreement precludes it from voluntarily producing the Agreement, as requested by petitioners. As to petitioners' request for the Report of Interview with Jane Doe # I, counsel for the Government has spoken with FBI Special Agents Nesbitt Kurykendall and Jason Richardson, who have advised that no Report of Interview was prepared subsequent to their meeting with Jane Doe # 1 in late September 2007, to discuss the Non-Prosecution Agreement entered into with Jeffrey Epstein. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/ Dexter A. Lee DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney Fla. Bar No. 0936693 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 (305) 961-9320 Fax: (305) 530-7139 E-mail: dexter.lee@usdoj.gov Attorney for Respondent CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE EFTA00204625 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. s/ Dexter A. Lee DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 21 United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 2028 Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 (954) 414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 EFTA00204626

Technical Artifacts (7)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emaildexter.lee@usdoj.gov
FaxFax: (305) 530-7139
FaxFax: (954) 924-1530
Phone(305) 530-7139
Phone(305) 961-9320
Phone(954) 414-8033
Phone(954) 924-1530

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CM/ECF - Live Database

CM/ECF - Live Database r Page 1 of 3 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-KA M Doe'. United States of America Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Cause: no cause specified Date Filed: 07/07/2008 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant LRJ Date Filed # Docket Text 07/07/2008 1 EMERGENCY PETITION for Victim's Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act 18 USC 3771 against United States of America Filing fee $ 350. Receipt#: 724403, filed by Jane Doe. (rb) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/07/2008 2 CERTIFICATE OF EMERGENCY by Jane Doe re 1 Complaint (rb) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/07/2008 3 ORDER requiring U.S. Attorney to respond to 1 Complaint filed by Jane Doe by 5:00 p.m. on 7/9/08. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/7/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/09/2008 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dexter Lee on behalf of United States of America (

204p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

SUSPECTED MOTIVE BEHIND GOVERNMENT AND POLICE SOURCES INVOLVED

SUSPECTED MOTIVE BEHIND GOVERNMENT AND POLICE SOURCES INVOLVED IN CONSPIRED COVER UP OF FAMIL L MOLESTATION OF TARGETED VICTIM TH H R BY THE BROTHER FAMILY MEMBER ANTHEThra GATION AND CON- SPIRED ATTACK Or rit /WILY I O DEMORALISE THE DAUGHTER, SISTER AND DISCREDIT HER CREDITABILITY AND TARGETING HER WITH A SEXUAL ABUSE RING CONNECTED TO GOVERNMENT SOURCES AND EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL SUSPECTED MOTIVE OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INVOLVEMENT : COMMENCEMENT - KADINA • JOHN OLSEN - MAYOR OF KADINA - LIBERAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER • ROWAN RAMSAY - FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER - KADINA AND PORT PIRIE The mother, i= suspected of being sexually active in the community of Kadina as a teenager invo ving sexual interaction with the government officials involved in Kadina John Olsen, Kadina and Rowan Ramsay, Kadina / Port Pine and the overnment officials knowledge of this sexual activity and manipulated by the mother to assist in the family secret cover up under the act of the motive of th

70p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO VICTIMS' MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement, and states: I. THE MOTION TO UNSEAL SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT HAS NEVER BEEN FILED UNDER SEAL IN THIS COURT. Petitioners have filed their motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement, claiming that no good cause exists for sealing it. As an initial matter, the motion should be denied because the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by the United States, either under seal or otherwise. On August 14, 2008, this Court held a telephonic hearing to discuss petitioners' r

7p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.