Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00204922DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: Jane Does 1 US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss

Subject: RE: Jane Does 1 US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:26:21 +0000 Importance: Normal Mid morning is fine for me. Subject: Re: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Would mid-morning (about 10:30) work for everyone, or do you have another preference? Subject: Re: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Let me know what time Subject: RE: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Let's do it tomorrow. I will have my Blackberry on. I believe our replies are due on December 15. I am set to go to trial before Judge Ungaro during the two week term commencing January 16, 2012. She just denied my motion for continuance, so it looks like the case is going forward. Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:02 PM Subject: Re: Jane Does I US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss I'm actually out of the office today on sick leave. If you want to talk today, I can call in, but I have not yet had a chance to

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00204922
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

Subject: RE: Jane Does 1 US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:26:21 +0000 Importance: Normal Mid morning is fine for me. Subject: Re: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Would mid-morning (about 10:30) work for everyone, or do you have another preference? Subject: Re: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Let me know what time Subject: RE: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Let's do it tomorrow. I will have my Blackberry on. I believe our replies are due on December 15. I am set to go to trial before Judge Ungaro during the two week term commencing January 16, 2012. She just denied my motion for continuance, so it looks like the case is going forward. Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:02 PM Subject: Re: Jane Does I US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss I'm actually out of the office today on sick leave. If you want to talk today, I can call in, but I have not yet had a chance to

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Subject: RE: Jane Does 1 US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:26:21 +0000 Importance: Normal Mid morning is fine for me. Subject: Re: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Would mid-morning (about 10:30) work for everyone, or do you have another preference? Subject: Re: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Let me know what time Subject: RE: Jane Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Let's do it tomorrow. I will have my Blackberry on. I believe our replies are due on December 15. I am set to go to trial before Judge Ungaro during the two week term commencing January 16, 2012. She just denied my motion for continuance, so it looks like the case is going forward. Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:02 PM Subject: Re: Jane Does I US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss I'm actually out of the office today on sick leave. If you want to talk today, I can call in, but I have not yet had a chance to review the sealed pleading and I was not inclined to forward the sealed document to my gmail account. Let me know what you both prefer. Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 03:54 PM EFTA00204922 Subject: RE: Jane Does I US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss I will be out of the office tomorrow, but I can call in. Do you want to try something today? Sent Thursday, December 08, 2011 3:39 PM Can all three of us get together on the phone tomorrow? Dismiss From: Vlllafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:47 AM To: Sanchez, Eduardo (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Does I. US — Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Hi Ed and Dexter — Here is the sealed portion of their response. Judge Marra's clerk called to confirm that we had no objection to the Motion to Seal. I stated that we had no objection. I am on vacation next week. We really HAVE to get this file transferred to the Middle District. «20111206 Sealed Response to Motn to Dismiss.pdf» EFTA00204923

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11

11p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.