Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00204925DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USAFLS)"

From: (USAFLS)" To: " >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:11:50 +0000 Importance: Normal I will come on up. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursd December 01, 2011 11:05 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States Sounds fine. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:00 AM To: . (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I Enited States Shall we confer briefly at 1:30 to make sure we're on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda December 01, 2011 10:17 AM To: USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. E

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00204925
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: (USAFLS)" To: " >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:11:50 +0000 Importance: Normal I will come on up. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursd December 01, 2011 11:05 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States Sounds fine. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:00 AM To: . (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I Enited States Shall we confer briefly at 1:30 to make sure we're on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda December 01, 2011 10:17 AM To: USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. E

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USAFLS)" To: " >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:11:50 +0000 Importance: Normal I will come on up. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursd December 01, 2011 11:05 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States Sounds fine. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:00 AM To: . (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I Enited States Shall we confer briefly at 1:30 to make sure we're on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda December 01, 2011 10:17 AM To: USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States Yes, I think we need to call him. Do you want to try for 1:30 since we have the time already set aside? Assistant U.S. Attorney Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:15 AM To: . (USAFLS); (USAFLS) EFTA00204925 Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States I just received a call from assistant. is canceling today's conference call; he is feeling a little under the weather and is not coming into the office today. She told me that he will call me tomorrow to reschedule. Sorry. Given that it is unlikely that we are going to have a substantive discussion with this week, do you think we should reach out and call Cassell back before the week is over? I admit that thought is also making me feel a little bit under the weather. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:35 PM To: USAFLM Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States Cc: .(USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) We're on for 1:30 tomorrow. I'll set things up for a conference call at that time and send out the call-in information. Thanks, From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda November 29, 2011 6:11 PM To: USAFLM) Cc: .(USAFLS); (USAFLS); Subject: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States Hi, M. I hope you had a great Thanksgiving. (USAFLS) As we had previously discussed, I am contacting you to see if we can set up a telephone conference to address some of the outstanding matters that we need to discuss to complete the transfer of the criminal case to your district and meet our obligations under USAP 3-2.170.001. (I also left a message with your assistant earlier today.) Those matters include: the nature and scope of any charges/investigation that may potentially remain viable in the SDFL following the entry of the Non-Prosecution Agreement; the need to advise the FBI in connection with the agents' pending requests for grand jury subpoenas and their expressed intent to continue investigating allegations against Epstein, advice which in all likelihood will require informing the FBI agents about other USAOs that might be able to assist them in light of the grand jury evidence previously obtained; and the handling of the criminal case file. We ( who was previously assigned to the criminal investigation; who is handling the CVRA litigation; and me) can make ourselves available to confer with you after 10:30 tomorrow morning, tomorrow afternoon, or Thursday morning. If those blocks of time do not work, please let us know and we can make other arrangements to accommodate your schedule. Thanks, EFTA00204926 I United States Attorneys Office E-mail: EFTA00204927

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11

11p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.