Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00205236DOJ Data Set 9Other

From:'

From:' . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN. TO: " ). Subject: Jane Doe Case Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:17:50 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: : DE48- ; DE48- DE48- DE48- DE48_20110321_Motn_for_finding_a_violation_of CVRA.pdf; DE48- Hi Ed - FINALLY, I found it. Now I know why the court wants us to make our documents searchable. See DE 48 at pages 3-4, paragraph #1. They specifically cite the Complaints and refer to Jane Does #1 and #2. On page 5, paragraph 4, they make clear that Jane Doe #1 is by referring to her 302, which they attach as Exhibit B. They also explain that Jane Doe #1 is C.W. and Jane Doe #2 is by referring to their victim notification I tt n , paragraphs 6&7, which they attach as Exhibits C&D. (See also paragraph 37 and Judge White granted my motion for extension of time this morning. I am running off to court now, but should be back by 11:15. Let me know how I can help, okay? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 We

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00205236
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From:' . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN. TO: " ). Subject: Jane Doe Case Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:17:50 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: : DE48- ; DE48- DE48- DE48- DE48_20110321_Motn_for_finding_a_violation_of CVRA.pdf; DE48- Hi Ed - FINALLY, I found it. Now I know why the court wants us to make our documents searchable. See DE 48 at pages 3-4, paragraph #1. They specifically cite the Complaints and refer to Jane Does #1 and #2. On page 5, paragraph 4, they make clear that Jane Doe #1 is by referring to her 302, which they attach as Exhibit B. They also explain that Jane Doe #1 is C.W. and Jane Doe #2 is by referring to their victim notification I tt n , paragraphs 6&7, which they attach as Exhibits C&D. (See also paragraph 37 and Judge White granted my motion for extension of time this morning. I am running off to court now, but should be back by 11:15. Let me know how I can help, okay? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 We

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN. TO: " ). Subject: Jane Doe Case Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:17:50 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: : DE48- ; DE48- DE48- DE48- DE48_20110321_Motn_for_finding_a_violation_of CVRA.pdf; DE48- Hi Ed - FINALLY, I found it. Now I know why the court wants us to make our documents searchable. See DE 48 at pages 3-4, paragraph #1. They specifically cite the Complaints and refer to Jane Does #1 and #2. On page 5, paragraph 4, they make clear that Jane Doe #1 is by referring to her 302, which they attach as Exhibit B. They also explain that Jane Doe #1 is C.W. and Jane Doe #2 is by referring to their victim notification I tt n , paragraphs 6&7, which they attach as Exhibits C&D. (See also paragraph 37 and Judge White granted my motion for extension of time this morning. I am running off to court now, but should be back by 11:15. Let me know how I can help, okay? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fa .MM EFTA00205236

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferring

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 1 of 7

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.