Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00205513DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

From: ' To:' (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:54:55 +0000 Importance: Normal I will confirm for you. The other case I think is Brad has represented at least a half dozen women who sued JE. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunday, January 08 2012 12:17 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Is there some way we can make sure so we can get all of the Petitioners' complaints. It's an important part of the argument. You're sure only one of them sued in state court? Brad represented plaintiffs in both of the cases I forwarded to you. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunda Janua 08, 2012 11:16 AM To: (USAFLS); Lee, (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Hi I am 90% sure that III is our Jane Doe #1. Jane Doe #2 did not sue in federal court. She sued in Palm Beach County state court. I am pretty sure I have her case number somewhere. I don't think I have ever seen her civil complaint. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00205513
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From: ' To:' (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:54:55 +0000 Importance: Normal I will confirm for you. The other case I think is Brad has represented at least a half dozen women who sued JE. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunday, January 08 2012 12:17 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Is there some way we can make sure so we can get all of the Petitioners' complaints. It's an important part of the argument. You're sure only one of them sued in state court? Brad represented plaintiffs in both of the cases I forwarded to you. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunda Janua 08, 2012 11:16 AM To: (USAFLS); Lee, (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Hi I am 90% sure that III is our Jane Doe #1. Jane Doe #2 did not sue in federal court. She sued in Palm Beach County state court. I am pretty sure I have her case number somewhere. I don't think I have ever seen her civil complaint. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' To: ' (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:54:55 +0000 Importance: Normal I will confirm for you. The other case I think is Brad has represented at least a half dozen women who sued JE. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunday, January 08 2012 12:17 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Is there some way we can make sure so we can get all of the Petitioners' complaints. It's an important part of the argument. You're sure only one of them sued in state court? Brad represented plaintiffs in both of the cases I forwarded to you. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunda Janua 08, 2012 11:16 AM To: (USAFLS); Lee, (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Hi I am 90% sure that III is our Jane Doe #1. Jane Doe #2 did not sue in federal court. She sued in Palm Beach County state court. I am pretty sure I have her case number somewhere. I don't think I have ever seen her civil complaint. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 06:32 PM To: I . (USAFLS); Lee, (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Were either of you able to confirm that these plaintiffs are our petitioners? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 08:26 PM To: I . (USAFLS); Lee, (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Doe litigation Can you confirm that the plaintiffs in the cases cited below are the petitioners in our CVRA matter? First Am. Compl. ¶¶ 32-33, Doe g Epstein, Case No. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA ("assen[ing] a cause of action against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to [18 U.S.C. § 2255] and the [Non-Prosecution] agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government"); Compl. n 19-20, L.M. g Epstein, Case No. 09- 81092-CIV-Cohn (asserting that plaintiff was "covered by" provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the government and Epstein and that Epstein was thus "estopped by his plea and agreement with the Federal EFTA00205513 Government from denying the acts alleged in [the] Complaint, and must effectively admit liability to the Plaintiff, L.M., including admitting liability for all counts enumerated in this Complaint") Thanks, EFTA00205514

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02726140

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01735410

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.