From: '
From: ' To:' (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:54:55 +0000 Importance: Normal I will confirm for you. The other case I think is Brad has represented at least a half dozen women who sued JE. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunday, January 08 2012 12:17 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Is there some way we can make sure so we can get all of the Petitioners' complaints. It's an important part of the argument. You're sure only one of them sued in state court? Brad represented plaintiffs in both of the cases I forwarded to you. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunda Janua 08, 2012 11:16 AM To: (USAFLS); Lee, (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Hi I am 90% sure that III is our Jane Doe #1. Jane Doe #2 did not sue in federal court. She sued in Palm Beach County state court. I am pretty sure I have her case number somewhere. I don't think I have ever seen her civil complaint. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday
Summary
From: ' To:' (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:54:55 +0000 Importance: Normal I will confirm for you. The other case I think is Brad has represented at least a half dozen women who sued JE. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunday, January 08 2012 12:17 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Is there some way we can make sure so we can get all of the Petitioners' complaints. It's an important part of the argument. You're sure only one of them sued in state court? Brad represented plaintiffs in both of the cases I forwarded to you. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Sunda Janua 08, 2012 11:16 AM To: (USAFLS); Lee, (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Hi I am 90% sure that III is our Jane Doe #1. Jane Doe #2 did not sue in federal court. She sued in Palm Beach County state court. I am pretty sure I have her case number somewhere. I don't think I have ever seen her civil complaint. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday
Persons Referenced (3)
“...ubject: Re: Jane Doe litigation Hi I am 90% sure that III is our Jane Doe #1. Jane Doe #2 did not sue in federal court. She sued in Palm Beach County state court. I am pretty sure I have her case n...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...e No. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA ("assen[ing] a cause of action against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to [18 U.S.C. § 2255] and the [Non-Prosecution] agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epst...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA02726140
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne
STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater
EFTA Document EFTA01735410
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.