Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 159 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2012 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 159 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2012 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/HOPICINS JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR INTERVENTION BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Intervene For Limited Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (DE 93). This matter is fully briefed and is now ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the briefs and is fully advised in the premises. "Permissive intervention under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)] is appropriate where a party's claim or defense and the main action have a question of law or fact in common and the intervention will not unduly prejudice or delay the adjudication of the rights of the original parties." Mt. Hawley Ins. Co.. Sandy Lake Properties, Inc., 425 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing Georgia United States Army Corps of
Summary
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 159 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2012 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/HOPICINS JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR INTERVENTION BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Intervene For Limited Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (DE 93). This matter is fully briefed and is now ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the briefs and is fully advised in the premises. "Permissive intervention under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)] is appropriate where a party's claim or defense and the main action have a question of law or fact in common and the intervention will not unduly prejudice or delay the adjudication of the rights of the original parties." Mt. Hawley Ins. Co.. Sandy Lake Properties, Inc., 425 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing Georgia United States Army Corps of
Persons Referenced (3)
“... SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/HOPICINS JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR INTERVENTION BY JEFFREY EPSTE...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR INTERVENTION BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Intervene For Limited Intervention by Jeffrey Epstei...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80736-KAMRelated Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01660111
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne
Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire
EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater
EFTA02335898
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.