From: '
From: ' (USAFLS)" To:"- (USAFLS)" < Subject: Re: Epstein Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:23:51 +0000 Importance: Normal is starting a trial. I will see what I can do on Tuesday. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, October 07,_2011 03:21 PM To: . (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Epstein (USAFLS) Sure. But given the timetable created by the Jane Does' discovery request, do you think it would be possible to meet earlier than October 27th? If some district (whether MDFL or some other district) with venue and jurisdiction over the offenses is going to evaluate potential criminal charges and is willing to confer with Jane Does as part of that evaluation, it seems to me that it would be helpful to know that sooner rather than later for purposes of the CVRA litigation and the contemplated motion to dismiss. What do you think? By the way, was the MDFL given a copy of the NPA? I think they should be made aware that they should carefully review it to ensure that they do not run afoul of i
Summary
From: ' (USAFLS)" To:"- (USAFLS)" < Subject: Re: Epstein Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:23:51 +0000 Importance: Normal is starting a trial. I will see what I can do on Tuesday. AUSA From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, October 07,_2011 03:21 PM To: . (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Epstein (USAFLS) Sure. But given the timetable created by the Jane Does' discovery request, do you think it would be possible to meet earlier than October 27th? If some district (whether MDFL or some other district) with venue and jurisdiction over the offenses is going to evaluate potential criminal charges and is willing to confer with Jane Does as part of that evaluation, it seems to me that it would be helpful to know that sooner rather than later for purposes of the CVRA litigation and the contemplated motion to dismiss. What do you think? By the way, was the MDFL given a copy of the NPA? I think they should be made aware that they should carefully review it to ensure that they do not run afoul of i
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
EFTA Document EFTA01735410
J. MICHAEL BURMAN. RA'
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater
EFTA01325051
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.