Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00205709DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 1 of 3

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANDE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FIVE EXTRA PAGES TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE BY ROY BLACK ET AL. COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to allow them five extra pages beyond the twenty-page limit to respond to the Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 94) and the government response thereto (DE 100). The motion is unopposed. In support of the motion, the victims note that initial Supplemental Briefing from Epstein they are responding to (DE 94) is 23 pages long. The Government's response (DE 100) supports many of Epstein's arguments

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00205709
Pages
3
Persons
5
Integrity

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANDE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FIVE EXTRA PAGES TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE BY ROY BLACK ET AL. COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to allow them five extra pages beyond the twenty-page limit to respond to the Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 94) and the government response thereto (DE 100). The motion is unopposed. In support of the motion, the victims note that initial Supplemental Briefing from Epstein they are responding to (DE 94) is 23 pages long. The Government's response (DE 100) supports many of Epstein's arguments

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANDE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FIVE EXTRA PAGES TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE BY ROY BLACK ET AL. COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to allow them five extra pages beyond the twenty-page limit to respond to the Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 94) and the government response thereto (DE 100). The motion is unopposed. In support of the motion, the victims note that initial Supplemental Briefing from Epstein they are responding to (DE 94) is 23 pages long. The Government's response (DE 100) supports many of Epstein's arguments and is 11 pages long. As a result, the victims have a total of 33 pages that they need to respond to. The victims require 25 pages to set forth all of their arguments and authorities on the issues addressed in the briefs. The victims have discussed this motion with counsel for Epstein and the Government, and they do not oppose the motion. 1 EFTA00205709 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 2 of 3 CONCLUSION For all the foregoing reasons, the Court should allow Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 an additional five pages (a total of 25 pages) to respond to the Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 94) and the government response thereto (DE 100). DATED: October 10. 2011 Respectfully Submitted, 5/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Universit of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 2 EFTA00205710 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The foregoing document was served on October 10, 2011, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: A. Marie Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorney West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorney for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. Miami, FL 33131 Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. 3 EFTA00205711

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CWECF - Live Database - flsd

CWECF - Live Database - flsd Page I of 24 WM U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Internal Use Only Doe . United States of America Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Cause: no cause specified Date Filed: 07/07/2008 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant Petitioner Jane Doe represented by Bradley James Edwards Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL I. Respondent United States of America Fax: 954-524-2822 Email: brad®pathtojustice.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jay C. Howell Jay Howell & Associates PA Paul G. Cassell En e represented by https://ecf.fisd.circll.den/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17818316027212123-L_1_0-1 6/27/2013 EFTA00209211 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 2 of 24 561-820-8711 Fax: 820-8777 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Intervenor Roy Black Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 2

24p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2011 Page 1 of 14

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING OF INTERVENORS ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING PRODUCTION, USE, AND DISCLOSURE OF PLEA NEGOTIATIONS During the hearing on August 12, 2011, the Court directed the proposed intervenors to file additional briefing on their argument that plea negotiations are privileged and not subject to discovery or use as evidence in these proceedings. Proposed intervenors submit the following memorandum of law, which is identical to Parts I and II of the memorandum of law submitted by proposed intervenor Jeffrey Epstein in support of his motion for a protective order and his opposition to the motions of the plaintiffs for production, use,

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/2672011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES, Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52), Plaintiffs' Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49), Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (DE 50), and Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79).1 All motions are fully briefed and ripe for review, and the Court has heard oral arguments on all motions. The Court has carefully considered the briefing and the parties' arguments and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental brie

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40

446p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 98

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.