sunject: ML: Revised JointStatement

sunject: ML: Revised JointStatement ae s Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:13:56 +0000 Importance: Normal The afternoon of December 1 is a good time for Subject: RE: Revised Joint Statement of Facts Dear Dexter, Thanks for giving us a proposed statement of facts from the Government. It immediately raises many question for us, including: 1. We notice that you have objected to a number of our facts that are based -- word-for-word -- on e-mails prepared by the Government. You mention that you would like tosee these e-mails. Marie has a full copy of what we were sent by Epstein's counsel. And, of course, these are all the Govemmen't e-mails to begin with. 2. Given that you have copies all of these emails, can you agree to all the facts reflected by the e-mails? We really don't understand the basis for your objection to our facts quoting THE GOVERNMENT'S e-mails? Is there really some dispute about these facts? 3. As you and Marie know, the emails in our possession were, improperly, r