(USAFLS)"
From: (USAFLS)" To: ' (USAFLS)" Cc: "-.(USAFLS)" Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:44:01 +0000 Importance: Normal How is it pending? From: To: USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS); Sent: Thu Jun 17 16:30:27 2010 Subject: RE: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL USAFLS) (USAFLS); Our position is that the investigation is still open and pending. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda June 17 2010 4:28 PM To: (USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL (USAFLS (USAFLS) Q: is stuff pending on this, so we can just take the easy way out? From: To: USAFLS); USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Sent: Thu Jun 17 16:15:52 2010 Subject RE: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL (USAFLS) The responses to Questions 1, 2, 5-9, and 11-16, are "you have to ask or ." I think that the response previously given by was that the case began as a State prosecution and he believed that it should remain as a State prosecution, s
Summary
From: (USAFLS)" To: ' (USAFLS)" Cc: "-.(USAFLS)" Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:44:01 +0000 Importance: Normal How is it pending? From: To: USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS); Sent: Thu Jun 17 16:30:27 2010 Subject: RE: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL USAFLS) (USAFLS); Our position is that the investigation is still open and pending. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda June 17 2010 4:28 PM To: (USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL (USAFLS (USAFLS) Q: is stuff pending on this, so we can just take the easy way out? From: To: USAFLS); USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Sent: Thu Jun 17 16:15:52 2010 Subject RE: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL (USAFLS) The responses to Questions 1, 2, 5-9, and 11-16, are "you have to ask or ." I think that the response previously given by was that the case began as a State prosecution and he believed that it should remain as a State prosecution, s
Persons Referenced (2)
“... the US agree not to institute any criminal charges against his co conspirators Ghislaine Maxwell, and in light of the evidence? 14. Why are the grand jury subpoenas going to be withdrawn at the co...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...oday. I am confused about certain legal issues. When I asked this morning why Jeffrey Epstein was not charged with child sex trafficking given the 2000 TVPA federal laws, she did not want to respon...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
csamoff1@verizon.netcsamoffl@vethon.netRelated Documents (6)
EFTA01905212
EFTA01838551
reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that
reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, [REDACTED - Survivor], Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science
GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]
GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...
EFTA01682184
Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage
The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.