Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00207976DOJ Data Set 9

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 78

Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 05,02/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to oppose the motion of attorneys Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Leflcowitz (hereinafter referred to as "defense attorneys") to intervene in this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a) (DE #56). The motion to intervene should be denied for three separate reasons. First, the defense attorneys have not shown that they have an "interest" in the "transaction" at issue in this case, as required by Rule 24(a). This case involves crime victims' efforts to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act - an issue of no concern to the de

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00207976
Pages
8
Persons
6
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.