Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00208158DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 1 of 3

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S PROTECTIVE MOTION TO COMPEL COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this protective motion to compel. For the reasons explain in the victims' Response to the Government's Motion to Stay Discovery, the victims move this Court to order the Government to comply with their discovery requests. In particular, after the Court denies the Government's motion to dismiss, the Court should then order the Government to produce within 14 days: (1) The Government's initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1); I (2) Answers to all of the victims' requests for admission; (3) All documents, correspondence, and other information that the Government d

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00208158
Pages
3
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S PROTECTIVE MOTION TO COMPEL COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this protective motion to compel. For the reasons explain in the victims' Response to the Government's Motion to Stay Discovery, the victims move this Court to order the Government to comply with their discovery requests. In particular, after the Court denies the Government's motion to dismiss, the Court should then order the Government to produce within 14 days: (1) The Government's initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1); I (2) Answers to all of the victims' requests for admission; (3) All documents, correspondence, and other information that the Government d

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S PROTECTIVE MOTION TO COMPEL COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this protective motion to compel. For the reasons explain in the victims' Response to the Government's Motion to Stay Discovery, the victims move this Court to order the Government to comply with their discovery requests. In particular, after the Court denies the Government's motion to dismiss, the Court should then order the Government to produce within 14 days: (1) The Government's initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1); I (2) Answers to all of the victims' requests for admission; (3) All documents, correspondence, and other information that the Government distributed to persons or entities outside of the federal Government or received from persons or entities outside of the federal government:2 and The victims made their initial disclosures to the Government more than seven months ago. 2 The Government cannot plausible raise any kind of "privilege" argument to non- confidential materials shared with persons or entities outside of the federal government. 1 EFTA00208158 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 2 of 3 (4) All documents, correspondence, and other information covered by the victims' discovery request that is not subject to a claim of privilege. The Court should also direct that, with respect to all documents, correspondence, and other information for which the Government is asserting privilege, within those 14 days the Government should provide a "privilege log" consistent with Local Rule 26.1(g), including a description each document that is consistent with Local Rule 26.1(g)(3)(B). The privilege log should include the type of document, general subject matter of the document, date of the document, and author and addressee of the document or correspondence. CONCLUSION The Court should enter an order compelling the Government to comply with to comply with the victims' discovery requests within 14 days. DATED: December 5 2011 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the 2 EFTA00208159 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 3 of 3 University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The foregoing document was served on December 5, 2011, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: EFTA00208160

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJun 16, 2023

Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire

EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
Court UnsealedMar 17, 2016

Usg-Lavabit-Unsealed

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia - (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-sw-00522-CMH-1 Case title: USA v. In Re: Information Associated Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Date Terminated: 03/24/2015 with [Redacted] Assigned to: District Judge Claude M. Hilton Appeals court case number: 13-4625 Defendant (1) In Re: Information Associated with [Redacted] TERMINATED: 03/24/2015 Pending Counts Disposition None Highest Offense Level (Opening) None Terminated Counts Disposition None

560p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016005

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.