Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00208212DOJ Data Set 9

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 179 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2012 Page 1 of 5

Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 179 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2012 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marranohnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR A PROMPT RULING DENYING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO STAY COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to request an expedited ruling on the Government's Motion to Stay. The Government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of other motions) the Court has yet to rule on this particular motion. The practical effect of a lack of a ruling on that motion has been to effectively grant the stay - blocking discovery in this case. Court should rule quickly on that motion and deny that motion. Denying the stay would allow the limited discovery that the Court has previously authorized to move forward in this case, putting the

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00208212
Pages
5
Persons
4
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.