SAFLS)"
From: To: SAFLS)" USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" ' USAFLS " SAFLS)".. (USAFLS)" Cc: (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair magazine Please confirm receipt. Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:29:46 +0000 Importance: Normal Okay, continuing on. Please see below. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida March 18, 2011 1:16 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair magazine Please confirm receipt. See my comments below. Also, when I was looking for the notice of breach letter regarding the work release, I found a letter that I had written to at PBSO regarding FBI's and my investigation into Epstein's sham charity work. I have attached that. That, also, should have formed the basis of a breach of the NPA, but we couldn't breach because of AA's side dealings. I have to run to court. I will answer the rest of the questions when I get back. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: (USAF
Summary
From: To: SAFLS)" USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" ' USAFLS " SAFLS)".. (USAFLS)" Cc: (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair magazine Please confirm receipt. Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:29:46 +0000 Importance: Normal Okay, continuing on. Please see below. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida March 18, 2011 1:16 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair magazine Please confirm receipt. See my comments below. Also, when I was looking for the notice of breach letter regarding the work release, I found a letter that I had written to at PBSO regarding FBI's and my investigation into Epstein's sham charity work. I have attached that. That, also, should have formed the basis of a breach of the NPA, but we couldn't breach because of AA's side dealings. I have to run to court. I will answer the rest of the questions when I get back. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: (USAF
Persons Referenced (6)
“...WE SENT A NOTICE OF BREACH LETTER, AND THAT WAS WHEN I RECEIVED THE CALL FROM JAY LEFKOWITZ SAYING THAT JAY AND ALAN DERSHOWITZ HAD GOTTEN APPROVAL FROM ALEX FOR JE TO GO...”
Guy Lewis“...KRISHER. THAT ENDED THE SAO CASE. WHEN THE CASE CAME TO OUR OFFICE, HE HIRED GUY LEWIS, THE USA WHO HIRED ME. GUY STARTED CALLING ME INCESSENTLY (5 OR MORE TIMES A D...”
Roy Black“...OUND ABOUT WORK RELEASE, SO AND I HAD A SPECIFIC SERIES OF CONVERSATIONS WITH ROY BLACK AND JACK GOLDBERGER ABOUT JE SERVING HIS TIME INCARCERATED 24 HOURS PER DAY. PURSUANT TO THE NPA, OUR OFFICE ...”
Alan Dershowitz“..., AND THAT WAS WHEN I RECEIVED THE CALL FROM JAY LEFKOWITZ SAYING THAT JAY AND ALAN DERSHOWITZ HAD GOTTEN APPROVAL FROM ALEX FOR JE TO GO OUT ON WORK RELEASE. AS FOR WHETHER JE WAS REALLY WORKING O...”
Jack Goldberger“...officer he was personally paying for, and be escorted to the office of attorney Jack Goldberger where he would be allowed to stay until 11:00 PM and then be returned to jail for the evening? Ostensib...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...re are questions I would like to have answered for a piece I am researching on Jeffrey Epstein. As life would have it I am going to be on a busman's holiday this coming week on Singer Island, FL. I ...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
john1885c@aol.comRelated Documents (6)
EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE
EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/1/2006 State Attorney Barry E. ICrischer Michael S. Reiter, Chief of Police for Town of Palm Beach Letter urging State Attorney to proceed with probable cause affidavits and case filing packages or to recuse himself 5/23/2006 File Opening Documents for Operation Leap Year 7/24/2006 Michael S. Reiter, Chief of Police for Town of Palm Beach Letter noting that Palm Beach Police Chief was unhappy with State Attorney's handling of case and was referring matter to the FBI for investigation 7/26/2006 South Florida Sun-Sentinel Article Regarding Chief Reiter's referral of case to FBI 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Colonial Bank (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Washington Mutual (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Capital One (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Chase (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Hyperion Air, Inc. (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to JEGE, Inc. (
EFTA00208419
EFTA00208419 01:50 PM Subject: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair magazine Please confirm receipt. It was a pleasure speaking with you this morning. As per your request here are questions I would like to have answered for a piece I am researching on Jeffrey Epstein. As life would have it I am going to be on a busman's holiday this coming week on Singer Island, FL. I would like to meet you and whomever else you think I should speak with. If not, I understand perfectly. Let me preface these questions by saying that AUS.6 who was in charge of the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has a remarkably record as a prosecutor. I also know that an AUSA does not have the authority to grant a potential defendant a non -prosecution agreement without the permission of higher ups in the Justice Department. Not quite three years ago, the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, granted Jeffrey Epstein a non- prosecution agreement in return for his accepting a FL State plea deal for his
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 April 22, 2008 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS la, Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Self-Report of Allegation of Conflict of Interest Dear Mr. I write to advise you that I have learned that lawyers for a target of one of my investigations, Jeffrey Epstein, have raised ethical concerns regarding my involvement in his potential prosecution in the Southern District of Florida. Specifically, I understand that Epstein's attorneys have notified Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher and/or her staff that I have an actual conflict of interest. As part of pre-indictment plea negotiations, the parties agreed that Epstein's victims would be allowed to collect civil damages from Epstein and that Epstein would provide counsel for the vict
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING QUESTIONS RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERNING THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to admit or deny the following facts: BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48) (the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Cont
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.