Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00209261DOJ Data Set 9

To: Paul Cassell MM.

Other

To: Paul Cassell MM. From: Jackie Percze Cc: ra' 'war's Subject: Re: Position on Motion for Expedited Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:02:59 +0000 Importance Normal He actually takes very good care of me! The truth is that you've always been very prompt and cordial with me and I wanted to do the same for you. I know this is important to you so I wanted you to know we were looking at it and would respond quickly. Here's our position, please would you quote it in both of your papers: We object to the Court considering the motion for a stay and the motion to dismiss without also considering the merits of the appeal. We filed our merits brief early, two weeks before it was due, to facilitate the court's consideration of the substantive issues in an expedited basis. We do not object to the court ordering expedited briefing on the remaining briefs (response brief and reply brief) and an expedited oral argument schedule. -- Jackie On Aug 6, 2013, at 8:52 AM

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00209261
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.