Subject: RE: (1) any more production; (2).matenals

From: To: Subject: RE: (1) any more production; (2).matenals Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 19:42:23 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.jpg; image004.jpg I should be available. From: Sent: Wednesda Ma 14 2014 1:52 PM To: Subject: RE: (1) any more production; (2) materials I will be here tomorrow morning. From: Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:21 PM To: Subject: FW: (1) any more production; (2) materials Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Brad Edwards Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:56 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: (1) any more production; (2), materials Hi First, I have reviewed all that has been produced and it is quite obvious (especially after comparing what was produced to us by Epstein in 2010) that there is a large volume of emails and other correspondence that has not been produced. So, preliminarily, can you give us a timetable on when you think you will be making that production? EFTA00209737 Second, after reviewing everything, and given the tremendous respect I have for S I think it would be very beneficial to set up a conference call with at least the four of us very soon (no later than next week if possible). Ultimately I understand that we may need to involve others in the discussions but initially I am hopeful that we can accomplish a lot, just the four of us. If you are amenable, then please give us a few dates within the next week when you can talk. Sincerely, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. Brad Edwards Trial Attorney From: Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 1:54 PM To: Paul Cassell; Brad Edwards Cc: Subject: RE: (1) any more production; (2)ffaterials Paul and Brad, The government has not produced all the correspondence requested. I am working on correspondence between Epstein's attorneys and the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Unit, which I should be able to e-mail tomorrow. is also working on additional material to be produced. Finally, there may be responsive materials from the DAG's office, which is different from what we produced to you on May 2, 2014. I will check to see if we have any documents regarding From: Paul Cassell Sent: Wednesday, IIIMPRI M To: I 3rad Edward Subject: RE: (1) any more production; (2) VR materials Dear We are writing for two reasons. First, we would like to confirm that you have produced all the correspondence that we have requested — that you're not contemplating any more production. Second, we now represen in her capacity as a crime victim. As such, we are requesting her 302's and all other information you nave gathered with respect to her. EFTA00209738 Thanks for your help on this. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah l- tp://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell Paul You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Monda , Ma 05, 2014 8:22 AM To: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: United States - Production of Documents - is one missing? Hi and I wanted to thank you for producing the correspondence last Friday. We're sure that was a lot of work, and we appreciate you getting that to us in a timely fashion. and I wanted to double check with you. The first file that we received was identified as RFP_2. We never received an RFP_1. In total we received eight files, as the title of your email suggested we would. The eight were: RFP_2 RFP_3_part_I RFP_3_part_II RFP_3_part_III RFP_5_Redacted RFP_8 RFP_19 RFP_mis Should we have received anything else? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. Brad and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah You can access my publications on http://ssm.com/author=30160 EFTA00209739 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Sent: May, May U2,1014 1:35 PM To: Paul Subject: Paul and Brad, United States - Production of Documents, One of Eight I will be sending you eight (8) files, broken into several e-mails. I have not gone through the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) files, although I have included the May 15, 2008 letter from the CEOS Chief advising Epstein's attorneys that the United States Attorney was acting within his discretion in prosecuting the case. On the documents pertaining to Epstein's appeal to the Deputy Attorney General's Office, the documents produced are copies provided to our Office. There may be more at the Deputy Attorney General's Office, which has been notified of the Eleventh Circuit's decision. EFTA00209740