Case Fileefta-efta00210105DOJ Data Set 9Subject: Fwd: WSJ follow-up question
Unknown2p5 persons
Subject: Fwd: WSJ follow-up question
Subject: Fwd: WSJ follow-up question Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 03:07:46 +0000 Importance: Normal FYI. The story was also on HLN. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Gershman, Jacob" <Jacob.Gershman wsj com> Link to post: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/01/05/behind-epstein-suit-a-tussle-over-due-process-and-victims-rights/ u • Itt: WSJ ralow-up question Hi, Jacob, Thank you for your inquiry. We will decline the opportunity to comment as the matter is ongoing. Best regards, From: Gershman, Jacob [mailto:Jacob.Gershmanwsj.corn] Sent: Monday, January 05 2015 4:54 PM Hi Marlene, I'm writing a follow-up post for WSJ's Law Blog looking at the "Jane Doe" lawsuit itself and the arguments put forward by the government and the plaintiffs. I just wanted to check to see if you wanted to include any additional EFTA00210105 comment on the merits of the lawsuit. At the moment, I'm just quoting from government briefs outlining its position. Thanks, Jacob Jacob Gershman
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.