Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00210105DOJ Data Set 9

Subject: Fwd: WSJ follow-up question

Other

Subject: Fwd: WSJ follow-up question Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 03:07:46 +0000 Importance: Normal FYI. The story was also on HLN. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Gershman, Jacob" <Jacob.Gershman wsj com> Link to post: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/01/05/behind-epstein-suit-a-tussle-over-due-process-and-victims-rights/ u • Itt: WSJ ralow-up question Hi, Jacob, Thank you for your inquiry. We will decline the opportunity to comment as the matter is ongoing. Best regards, From: Gershman, Jacob [mailto:Jacob.Gershmanwsj.corn] Sent: Monday, January 05 2015 4:54 PM Hi Marlene, I'm writing a follow-up post for WSJ's Law Blog looking at the "Jane Doe" lawsuit itself and the arguments put forward by the government and the plaintiffs. I just wanted to check to see if you wanted to include any additional EFTA00210105 comment on the merits of the lawsuit. At the moment, I'm just quoting from government briefs outlining its position. Thanks, Jacob Jacob Gershman

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00210105
Pages
2
Persons
5
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.