Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00210743DOJ Data Set 9

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 300 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2015 Page 1 of 4

Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 300 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2015 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, 1. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Defendant. EPSTEIN'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER There is no doubt that the Eleventh Circuit has held that Epstein's plea negotiation and settlement communications are not privileged. We acknowledged this throughout our initial filing. However, there also can be no doubt that despite these negotiations not being privileged, they are still confidential by longstanding tradition. And confidential material can be filed under seal, even if it is relevant, as the plaintiffs say, to an issue in the case. The question is not whether the material is relevant, but whether good cause exists to temporarily seal this confidential information pending a determination by the court as to whether all or part or none of the

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00210743
Pages
4
Persons
2
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.