Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00210838DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USAFLS)" <1

From: (USAFLS)" <1 To: Paul Cassell <I Cc: ' (le, "Brad Edwards ho Subject: Re: FBI agent declaration -- do you know when ... ? Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:12:57 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, I plan to file the agent's declaration on Friday, January 30. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 28, 2015, at 13:22, Paul Cassell < > wrote: Hey Thanks for your non-opposition on the extension of time — much appreciated. Quick question: You mentioned last week that you were planning to file a declaration from an FBI agent regarding contact with Jane Doe No. I. Do you know when you'll be filing that? We're trying to coordinate things on our end for a February 6 filing on all this, and are wondering whether the declaration will come in before February 6. Thanks for any information you can provide on this — just trying to get a sense of the timing so that we can make plans at our end. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe No.. Paul G. Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00210838
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From: (USAFLS)" <1 To: Paul Cassell <I Cc: ' (le, "Brad Edwards ho Subject: Re: FBI agent declaration -- do you know when ... ? Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:12:57 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, I plan to file the agent's declaration on Friday, January 30. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 28, 2015, at 13:22, Paul Cassell < > wrote: Hey Thanks for your non-opposition on the extension of time — much appreciated. Quick question: You mentioned last week that you were planning to file a declaration from an FBI agent regarding contact with Jane Doe No. I. Do you know when you'll be filing that? We're trying to coordinate things on our end for a February 6 filing on all this, and are wondering whether the declaration will come in before February 6. Thanks for any information you can provide on this — just trying to get a sense of the timing so that we can make plans at our end. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe No.. Paul G. Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USAFLS)" <1 To: Paul Cassell <I Cc: ' (le, "Brad Edwards ho Subject: Re: FBI agent declaration -- do you know when ... ? Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:12:57 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, I plan to file the agent's declaration on Friday, January 30. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 28, 2015, at 13:22, Paul Cassell < > wrote: Hey Thanks for your non-opposition on the extension of time — much appreciated. Quick question: You mentioned last week that you were planning to file a declaration from an FBI agent regarding contact with Jane Doe No. I. Do you know when you'll be filing that? We're trying to coordinate things on our end for a February 6 filing on all this, and are wondering whether the declaration will come in before February 6. Thanks for any information you can provide on this — just trying to get a sense of the timing so that we can make plans at our end. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe No.. Paul G. Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: (USAFLS) f mailto: Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:26 PM To: Paul Cassell Cc: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: motion for extra time - any opposition? Paul, We have no objection to your request for an enlargement of time until Friday, February 6, 2015, to file your reply. EFTA00210838 From: Paul Cassell [mailto: Sent: Tuesda January 27, 2015 1:46 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: motion for extra time - any opposition? Hi We're working on our reply to the Government's Opposition to JD3 and 4's Motion for Joinder. Along with my students, we are researching some of the complicated statute of limitations and other issues. Since you filed on January 20, we think our reply is due tomorrow, Jan. 28. We're hoping that the Government would not oppose a motion for an additional nine days to reply, making our reply due Friday, Feb. 6. On February 6, we also anticipate coupling our reply brief with a motion to amend under Rule 15 and so forth — we'll be back in touch with you on those issues. That is one other reason for the extra time. We are hoping you will agree to this request for extra time — thanks in advance for your response. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Does No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the Intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. EFTA00210839

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Brad Edwards

From: Brad Edwards To: Cc: Paul Cassell Subject: Re: Rescheduling Settlement Conference - bad date Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 20:39:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png I will forward everything to Paul. is calling me Tuesday. I will use that time to relay everything to her and see where we are then. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2016, at 4:23 PM, wrote: Hi Paul — Thank you for your email. July 5th is bad for us, too, but I saw Judge Brannon to sign some search warrants yesterday and, although we didn't talk about this case, he mentioned how full his schedule was. I don't know that he is going to be inclined to move it, especially in light of Jane Doe #1's status. I am wondering if you think it is possible for us to finalize things without going back to court? Brad now has our complete packet and I think if we can get things resolved over the next week, then we can take the settlement conference off the calendar and move on to asking Judg

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Re: Lack of jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit

Subject: Re: Lack of jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:37:07 +0000 Importance: Normal It has been sent. Thanks. On Jun 28, 2013, at 12:09 PM, "Paul Cassell" <cassellp@law.utah.edu> wrote: > Could you pass along our pleading to whoever else in the Department is considering how to proceed on Epstein's interlocutory appeal? We believe our pleading makes compelling arguments that the Eleventh Circuit lacks jurisdiction, at this time, over any such appeal. Thanks! > Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 > Paul G. Cassell > Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law > S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah > 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 > Voice: 801-585-5202 Fax: 801-581-6897 Email: cassellp@law.utah.edu > http://www.law.utah.edu/profilesldefault.asp?PersonlD=57&name=Cassell,Paul > You can access my publications on http://ssm.corn/author=30160 > CONFIDENTIAL: This e

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.