Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211084DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

From: ' (USAFLS)" ctl To: Paul "Brad Edwards ( Cc: "la i Ii,S"‹ (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Status of E-mail Review Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:31:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, My apologies for a delayed response, I was on travel to Columbia SC on February 23-24, 2017. The FBI identified two e-mail systems used by its employees: (1) the Unclassified Net (UNET), which is used to send and/or receive e-mails from outside the FBI. This would include emails from other DOJ components, other federal agencies, and other federal and/or state law enforcement agencies; and (2) the FBI Net (FBINET), which is used by FBI employees to communicate internally. The FBINET is secure and is capable of transmitting classified information. I was told that, since we were searching for older e-mails, they would not exist if the e-mail had been "double deleted," e.g., deleted from the e-mail inbox, and then deleted from the deleted items box. Also, e-mails on the FBINET were not regular

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211084
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: ' (USAFLS)" ctl To: Paul "Brad Edwards ( Cc: "la i Ii,S"‹ (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Status of E-mail Review Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:31:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, My apologies for a delayed response, I was on travel to Columbia SC on February 23-24, 2017. The FBI identified two e-mail systems used by its employees: (1) the Unclassified Net (UNET), which is used to send and/or receive e-mails from outside the FBI. This would include emails from other DOJ components, other federal agencies, and other federal and/or state law enforcement agencies; and (2) the FBI Net (FBINET), which is used by FBI employees to communicate internally. The FBINET is secure and is capable of transmitting classified information. I was told that, since we were searching for older e-mails, they would not exist if the e-mail had been "double deleted," e.g., deleted from the e-mail inbox, and then deleted from the deleted items box. Also, e-mails on the FBINET were not regular

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' (USAFLS)" ctl To: Paul "Brad Edwards ( Cc: "la i Ii,S"‹ (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Status of E-mail Review Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:31:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, My apologies for a delayed response, I was on travel to Columbia SC on February 23-24, 2017. The FBI identified two e-mail systems used by its employees: (1) the Unclassified Net (UNET), which is used to send and/or receive e-mails from outside the FBI. This would include emails from other DOJ components, other federal agencies, and other federal and/or state law enforcement agencies; and (2) the FBI Net (FBINET), which is used by FBI employees to communicate internally. The FBINET is secure and is capable of transmitting classified information. I was told that, since we were searching for older e-mails, they would not exist if the e-mail had been "double deleted," e.g., deleted from the e-mail inbox, and then deleted from the deleted items box. Also, e-mails on the FBINET were not regularly backed up until after the period specified for our search, 2006 - 2008. I asked the FBI to conduct a search of the e-mail accounts of Special Agents and the co-case agents in the Epstein criminal investigation. The search was to cover the period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008. I provided the FBI Information Technology section a copy of petitioners' Supplemental Request for Production to The Government Regarding Evidence of Government's Violations of Victim's Rights, dated August 25, 2016 (transmitted on August 29, 2016). I asked the FBI to design a search which would cover responsive e-mails, and told them I wanted a broad search. The FBI search yielded 246 emails on the UNET, and 1,908 on the FBINET, for Agents and email accounts. On January 18-19, 2017, and February 8, 2017, I went to the FBI Miami field office and reviewed the emails retrieved by the FBI. None of the e-mails I reviewed were responsive to Supplemental Discovery Requests 1 through 8. Specifically, I looked for e-mails expressing concern about individuals in the U.S. Attorney's Office having business, social, or other relationships with Epstein (Supp. Disc. Request No. 1), and the possible offer of future employment or client business by Epstein to members of the U.S. Attorney's Office (Supp. Dis. Request No. 2). I found none. As to Supplemental Discovery Request No. 3, there were e-mails "regarding the prosecution of the Epstein case," but none I found that pertained to prosecutors obtaining benefits from Epstein. If you have any questions, please call me at . Thank you for your courtesy in granting us additional time. From: Paul Cassell Imailto: Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 12:22 PM To: (USAFLS) < >; Brad Edwards EFTA00211084 Cc: .(USAFLS) Subject: RE: Status of E-mail Review (USAFLS) Brad and I just wanted to touch base with you on the status of this email review. We were under the impression that you would be providing something for us on Friday, per email below. Just wanted to see how things are coming along. Thanks in advance for any information you can provide. Paul Cassell for Jane Doe 1, 2, 3 and 4 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law and University Distinguished Professor of Law You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. From: (USAFLS) [mailto. Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 11:21 AM To: Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Status of E-mail Review Brad and Paul, ; Paul Cassell (USAFLS) A belated Happy New Year to both of you. During the week of January 17, 2017, I reviewed approximately 1800 emails at the FBI field office in Miramar, Florida. Due to an inspection being conducted by FBI Headquarters of the Miami office, I had to vacate the office I was using. I should be able to continue my review within the next two weeks. May we have an extension until February 24, 2017? Thanks. EFTA00211085

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://ssrn.com/author=30160

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Brad Edwards

From: Brad Edwards To: Cc: Paul Cassell Subject: Re: Rescheduling Settlement Conference - bad date Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 20:39:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png I will forward everything to Paul. is calling me Tuesday. I will use that time to relay everything to her and see where we are then. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2016, at 4:23 PM, wrote: Hi Paul — Thank you for your email. July 5th is bad for us, too, but I saw Judge Brannon to sign some search warrants yesterday and, although we didn't talk about this case, he mentioned how full his schedule was. I don't know that he is going to be inclined to move it, especially in light of Jane Doe #1's status. I am wondering if you think it is possible for us to finalize things without going back to court? Brad now has our complete packet and I think if we can get things resolved over the next week, then we can take the settlement conference off the calendar and move on to asking Judg

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Re: Lack of jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit

Subject: Re: Lack of jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:37:07 +0000 Importance: Normal It has been sent. Thanks. On Jun 28, 2013, at 12:09 PM, "Paul Cassell" <cassellp@law.utah.edu> wrote: > Could you pass along our pleading to whoever else in the Department is considering how to proceed on Epstein's interlocutory appeal? We believe our pleading makes compelling arguments that the Eleventh Circuit lacks jurisdiction, at this time, over any such appeal. Thanks! > Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 > Paul G. Cassell > Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law > S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah > 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 > Voice: 801-585-5202 Fax: 801-581-6897 Email: cassellp@law.utah.edu > http://www.law.utah.edu/profilesldefault.asp?PersonlD=57&name=Cassell,Paul > You can access my publications on http://ssm.corn/author=30160 > CONFIDENTIAL: This e

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Paul Cassell •ci

From: Paul Cassell •ci To: "IN (USAFLS)" ' Cc: , • (USAFLS)" USAFLS)" >, Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Judge Marra's Order Granting the Victims Motion to Compel Discovery Within 30 Days Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:46:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: ORDER-omnibus-wrapup.pdf [tried to send this earlier, but it may not have gone out] Dear We haven't seen the sealed order granting the Government's motion for stay either. (Have you?). But, in any event, Judge Marra's order on June 19, 2013 (DE 190) specifically stated that "The petitioners' motion to compel discovery from the Government [DE 130] is GRANTED. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of entry of this order, the Government shall . . . [produce various discovery]." For your convenience, I attach a copy of DE 190 ordering the Government to produce discovery within 30 days. So we are expecting to see you produce the bulk of our discovery on July 19, 2013, as specifically directed in DE 190 which granted our mo

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' (USAFLS)" To: >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:38:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi I.— You can get me on the line once calls in. I will be at my desk — 41047 A. Vi&faller Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: M, (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:11 PM To:a (USAFLS) < Cc:a MI I. (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and Si. Briefing Schedule I am out of class at 5:15 pm. What number shall I call? Sent from my iPhone c On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:56, a, (USAFLS) > wrote: Can we talk later this afternoon? Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Cassell <a> Date: March 8, 2017 at 8:51:03 AM EST To: "Brad Edwards (USAFLS)" Cc: " I. (USAFLS)" '`= > (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Dear I'm writing to express some concerns about the Government's recent response to our most recent discovery requests and to request a stipulated bri

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.