From: Brad Edwards <1
From: Brad Edwards <1 To: (USAFLS)" < Cc: (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Responses to Supplemental Requests for Admissions and Supplemental Request for Production Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:37:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Before we can answer that request, can you preliminarily just confirm that we will be getting substantive responses as opposed to just objections? Meaning, even if the true response is "none" which I don't believe it is - that would suffice and we would absolutely agree to an extension for you to complete your thorough review even if it is to ultimately produce nothing if in fact there is nothing. If, however, we are agreeing to an extension so that we can receive a longer list of objections for why responsive documents are being withheld then I would be less inclined to agree to the request. I think you can understand our position - if we are getting responses and not mere objections then absolutely we agree to the requested extension. Brad Sent from my iPhone
Summary
From: Brad Edwards <1 To: (USAFLS)" < Cc: (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Responses to Supplemental Requests for Admissions and Supplemental Request for Production Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:37:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Before we can answer that request, can you preliminarily just confirm that we will be getting substantive responses as opposed to just objections? Meaning, even if the true response is "none" which I don't believe it is - that would suffice and we would absolutely agree to an extension for you to complete your thorough review even if it is to ultimately produce nothing if in fact there is nothing. If, however, we are agreeing to an extension so that we can receive a longer list of objections for why responsive documents are being withheld then I would be less inclined to agree to the request. I think you can understand our position - if we are getting responses and not mere objections then absolutely we agree to the requested extension. Brad Sent from my iPhone
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Case 09-34791-RBR
The Palm Beach Post
Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire
EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20
07/29/2011 14:05 FAX 5616845816
EFTA01838551
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.