From: "

From: " To: " . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=AVILLAFANA> (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:47:28 +0000 Importance: Normal How quickly would I have a stroke if I worked up there? Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 5:46 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards DC action From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda , June 22, 2016 5:42 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards I was hoping that the suggestion might scare them into action! Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 5:41 PM To: . (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards (USAFLS) I guess a part of me must just have found the idea of a judge ordering someone at ODAG to do something a little bit appealing. EFTA00211347 From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda June 22, 2016 5:15 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards I was joking, my friend Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 5:14 PM To: . (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards (USAFLS) Nope. As it is, the meeting is a matter of executive grace and courtesy, and the Court has no authority to decide anything with respect to the meeting. It's a separation of powers issue that I don't think we can — or would ever -- turn over to even the best and most well-intentioned judge. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda June 22, 2016 5:11 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards We could let the Court decide who the meeting should be with . . . Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: (USAFLS) Sent Wednesday, June 22, 2016 5:09 PM To: . (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards (USAFLS) I am not available on July 5, July 29, August 1-5, and August 17-23. July 15, 20, and 22 are not great, but I can make those days work if necessary. is also out of town during the last week in July, so that is probably a bad week for the mediation since we might need his approval on anything new or different. We have been pressing DC, but DC is DC. We'll continue pressing, but they will continue to be DC. EFTA00211348 From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda , June 22, 2016 4:54 PM To: (USAFLS); Subject: Telephone conf with Brad Edwards (USAFLS) Hi and — I had a good call with Brad. He was on the road so he hasn't read the letter yet. He asked us to move the settlement conf date because he needs to time to go over things with but he doesn't want to put things off too far keeping in mind that is sitting in lock-up. When he reaches his destination, he is going to send me dates. I already notified the court that the date will be changed. They just asked that we send a motion with multiple dates so they can find one that works. With that in mind, can you send me your availability during July? I know you sent dates before, but your info might have changed. And, can we keep pressing DC? Brad would really like to sit down with with all of our proposals done. If she signs off on everything, we will not need a second mediation session. He has: (1) The settlement agreement with a blank space for the title of the recipient of the meeting (2) The letter (3) The proposed stip for dismissal and order I have received his list of victims and told him we need final versions of the proposed amendments to the DOJ Guidelines and USAM to include as appendices. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida EFTA00211349