Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212029DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

From: To: Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:12:51 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:10:09 2010 Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL You should have told me that when we spoke on the phone and I would not have wasted your time or mine. Please can you explain why npa is still pending? Is it because he is still under house confinement? And when (please give me a date), will you will answer my questions? Thank you. I feel strongly that having USAG abstain from answering these questions in a child sex trafficking case of this magnitude is not positive and at best a Pyrrhic victory for those whose job it is to uphold justice and our laws. At the end of the day public opinion will carry its own weight since it is always on the side of truth and justice. Laws that by the way the usag are supposed to uphold. Thank you Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:03:19 -0400 To: Cc: Subject: Re: PRI

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212029
Pages
3
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:12:51 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:10:09 2010 Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL You should have told me that when we spoke on the phone and I would not have wasted your time or mine. Please can you explain why npa is still pending? Is it because he is still under house confinement? And when (please give me a date), will you will answer my questions? Thank you. I feel strongly that having USAG abstain from answering these questions in a child sex trafficking case of this magnitude is not positive and at best a Pyrrhic victory for those whose job it is to uphold justice and our laws. At the end of the day public opinion will carry its own weight since it is always on the side of truth and justice. Laws that by the way the usag are supposed to uphold. Thank you Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:03:19 -0400 To: Cc: Subject: Re: PRI

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:12:51 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:10:09 2010 Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL You should have told me that when we spoke on the phone and I would not have wasted your time or mine. Please can you explain why npa is still pending? Is it because he is still under house confinement? And when (please give me a date), will you will answer my questions? Thank you. I feel strongly that having USAG abstain from answering these questions in a child sex trafficking case of this magnitude is not positive and at best a Pyrrhic victory for those whose job it is to uphold justice and our laws. At the end of the day public opinion will carry its own weight since it is always on the side of truth and justice. Laws that by the way the usag are supposed to uphold. Thank you Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:03:19 -0400 To: Cc: Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Since the non prosecution agreement is still pending, we cannot make any comment. Jeff From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:48:44 2010 Subject: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Hello =I, Thank you for callin me today. I am confused about certain legal issues. When I asked Marie Villafana this morning why Epstein was not charged with child sex trafficking given the 2000 TVPA federal laws, she did not want to respond. It s an important question that merits a substantial answer. In light of the arguments surrounding the case I would like to know: EFTA00212029 I. Why was prostitution? Epstein allowed to plead guilty to a single count of solicitation of minors to engage in 2. In light of the 5 trafficking offenses outlined on pages 1 & 2 of the NPA signed 10/29/07, why was Epstein given a twelve (12) months and six (6) months in a county jail (he served only 13 months), for all charges without adjudication or sentencing, and without probation or community control? 3. Unlike any other registered sex offender in the U.S. prison system today why didn't he serve time in a State penitentiary? Why was Epstein placed in a solitary cell at the West Palm Beach Stockade and only part time? Why was he allowed to go to "work" outside of prison for 13 months during the entire day? 4. Why didn't Epstein like all other registered sex offenders in the U.S. have an attached electronic monitor during his house confinement? 5. Why was prosecution for the offenses deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida? 6. In the ADDENDUM to the NPA (7A-C), Epstein is given the right to select and approve independent third party counselors for the victims. Why? 7.According to the NPA signed by MV there are 5 federal trafficking offenses. Why were they dismissed or deferred? 8. Why is Epstein given the right to contest damages up to an amount agreed to between the victims and Epstein? 9. Esptein's signature on NPA "is not to be construed as an admission of civil or criminal liability or a waiver of..." Please explain. Why? 10. What was the "gain time" Epstein earned during his period of incarceration? 11. Why would the NPA not be part of a public record? And why would the US have to provide notice to Epstein before making disclosure under a FOIA request? 12. Why was the Federal Grand Jury investigation suspended? 13. Wh the the US t ee not to institute an criminal cha _es tainst his co conspirators in light of the evidence? 14. Why are the grand jury subpoenas going to be withdrawn at the completion of the terms of the NPA? given that he is a registered sex offender and that most probably he will commit the crimes shortly after his release next month (this assumption based on empirical and medical data obtained from registered sex offenders), there seems to be no protection mechanism for the victims in place? 15. Why was JE allowed to choose the attorney's for the victims and put a cap on their restitution? 16. Why was the Federal investigation stopped by the USAG? 17. Why hasn't Epstein been rearrested given the 11+ parole violations reported to the parole board since his home confinement including weekly trips to NY and helicpter ride to travel only 9 miles? Sincerely, EFTA00212030 The message and any attachment may be confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy or distribute this message or any attachments and we ask that you please delete this message and any attachments and notify the sender by return email. Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person (s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentially or a privilege. EFTA00212031

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01735410

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: draft letter to DAG I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Airs: Assistant LAS Auorney 99N.& eth Street Aftam: Ft 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL EXPRESS June 2, 2008 Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein is a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors. In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. Marie Villafana of our West Palm Beach b

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

J. MICHAEL BURMAN. RA'

18p
House OversightLegal FilingNov 11, 2025

U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta Extends Deadline for CEOS Agreement Compliance

The passage is a routine procedural notice from a U.S. Attorney extending a deadline. It contains no allegations, financial details, or controversial actions involving high‑level officials, making it Letter dated May 19, 2008 from R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney. References a prior email sent on February 25, 2008 outlining a compliance timetable. Deadline extended to close of business Monday,

1p
House OversightEmailUnknown

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and ag...

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and agreements related to Mr. Epstein's case, including a plea agreement and non-prosecution agreement, and the need for factual basis to support the charges.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.