Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212106DOJ Data Set 9Other

EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal

EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal Page 1 of 2 on this story below More from Opinion Editorials, letters, columns and more special features The Opinion Zone Sound off in our blog Share This Story The agreement thus placed the Department of Justice in a role similar to those of the four women who procured girls for Epstein. If there's a precedent in this or any of the other 92 United States attorney's offices, we'd like to hear it. Not surprisingly, R. Alexander Acosta also agreed not to prosecute those women. PalmBeachPost.com EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal Palm Beach Post Editorial Tuesday, September 22, 2009 €u PRINTTHIS On the second page of the secret deal between federal prosecutors and Jeffrey Epstein, we read that the agreement will serve the interests of "the United States, the State of Florida, and the Defendant." Wrong on the first two, right on the third. Until Friday, the public didn't know the terms of the deal that finalized the case of t

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212106
Pages
2
Persons
5
Integrity

Summary

EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal Page 1 of 2 on this story below More from Opinion Editorials, letters, columns and more special features The Opinion Zone Sound off in our blog Share This Story The agreement thus placed the Department of Justice in a role similar to those of the four women who procured girls for Epstein. If there's a precedent in this or any of the other 92 United States attorney's offices, we'd like to hear it. Not surprisingly, R. Alexander Acosta also agreed not to prosecute those women. PalmBeachPost.com EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal Palm Beach Post Editorial Tuesday, September 22, 2009 €u PRINTTHIS On the second page of the secret deal between federal prosecutors and Jeffrey Epstein, we read that the agreement will serve the interests of "the United States, the State of Florida, and the Defendant." Wrong on the first two, right on the third. Until Friday, the public didn't know the terms of the deal that finalized the case of t

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal Page 1 of 2 on this story below More from Opinion Editorials, letters, columns and more special features The Opinion Zone Sound off in our blog Share This Story The agreement thus placed the Department of Justice in a role similar to those of the four women who procured girls for Epstein. If there's a precedent in this or any of the other 92 United States attorney's offices, we'd like to hear it. Not surprisingly, R. Alexander Acosta also agreed not to prosecute those women. PalmBeachPost.com EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal Palm Beach Post Editorial Tuesday, September 22, 2009 €u PRINTTHIS On the second page of the secret deal between federal prosecutors and Jeffrey Epstein, we read that the agreement will serve the interests of "the United States, the State of Florida, and the Defendant." Wrong on the first two, right on the third. Until Friday, the public didn't know the terms of the deal that finalized the case of the Palm Beacher who arranged to have girls brought to his house for sex and massages. Only Epstein's platoon of lawyers, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office knew the details. And now we know why the perpetrators of this outrage didn't want the public to know. The deal is an indictment of a system that did much more for a criminal than Postyour for his victims. Jeffrey Epstein - officially a registered sex offender but in comments plain terms a pervert - escaped what should have been serious prison time. Instead, the federal deal allowed him to plead guilty to light charges in state court. He spent just 13 months - nights only - in the Palm Beach County Jail. Meanwhile, the government tried to help Epstein buy off the young girls whom Epstein had exploited. Several of those girls have filed civil suits against Epstein. (Their lawyers and lawyers for The Post sued to make the plea deal public.) In the agreement, the government proposes to identify all the alleged victims and steer them to a lawyer, whose expenses Epstein would pay. In return, however, the victims would withdraw all lawsuits from state court and agree to a settlement in federal court of no more than $150,000 each. Even then, of course, Epstein would not acknowledge any "liability." If the outcome is frustrating, so is the lack of accountability. Mr. Acosta's name is on the deal, but he's now the dean of Florida International University's law school. A call to his office for comment Monday http://palmbeachpost.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=EDITORIAL%3A... 9/22/2009 EFTA00212106 EDITORIAL: Sleazy pap, sleazier deal Page 2 of 2 was not returned. The name of Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana is on the deal. She still works as a federal prosecutor in West Palm Beach, but Alicia Valle, the office's special counsel, said in an e- mail, "We cannot comment on your questions." Didn't she really mean will not? This case got into the federal system because former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter believed that Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krischer wasn't moving aggressively enough. Mr. Krischer retired last year. The assistant state attorney who oversaw the case is no longer with the office. At this point, the public must hope that the civil suits suck as much money from Epstein as possible. Money seems to be all that he understands. Also, Jeffrey Sloman is serving as the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida until President Obama nominates a permanent replacement for confirmation by the Senate. It would be good to know that whoever follows Mr. Acosta is on record that the Jeffrey Epstein deal did not serve the interests of the United States. Find this article at: http.-www.palmbeachpost.consoarch/contenttopiniorgepaper/2009/09/22412a_leadedit_epstein_0922.html F Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article. http://palmbeachpost.printthis.clickability.corn/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=EDITORIAL%3A... 9/22/2009 EFTA00212107

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainpalmbeachpost.com
URLhttp://palmbeachpost.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=EDITORIAL%3A
URLhttp://palmbeachpost.printthis.clickability.corn/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=EDITORIAL%3A
Wire Refreferenced

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

United States Attorney's Office

United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida NEWS BRIEFING To: From: Acting United States Attorney , Acting First Assistant Executive Assistant Special Counsel Acting Chief, Criminal Division Deputy Chief, Criminal Division Chief, Appellate Division Chief, Asset Forfeiture Division Chief, Civil Division Acting Chief, PINS Chief, Narcotics Chief, Economic and Environmental Crimes Section Chief, Major Crimes Section Chief, Special Prosecutions Acting Deputy Chief, Ft. Lauderdale Deputy Chief, West Palm Beach Deputy Chief, Ft. Pierce September 22, 2009 EFTA00189849 Southern District of Florida - Press Release Page 1 of I The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida Press Release SEBASTIAN WOMAN SENTENCED ON FRAUD CHARGES September 21, 2004 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Jeffrey II. Sloman, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Guy P. Fallen, Special Agent in Charge, Social Security Administration, Of

11p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00261288

I EFTA00261288 Jeffrey Epstein victim says in lawsuit she was recruited as sex slave Page 1 of 3 PalmBeachPost.com Jeffrey Epstein victim says in lawsuit she was recruited as sex slave By MICHELE DARGAN Palm Beach Daily News Wednesday. July 15. 2009 eta, PRINTTHIS New allegations have emerged in a federal lawsuit filed against convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. accusing him of - among other things - asking his 15-year- old victim to quit her job at The Mar-a-Lago Club to become what amounted to his sex slave. The lawsuit alleges that the girl. then working as a changing room assistant for $9 an hour at the club. was recruited there by Epstein's then-companion Ghislaine Maxwell in 1998. Maxwell told the girl, and her father who was an employee at the club, that she could learn massage therapy and earn a "great deal of money." the lawsuit says. Jeffrey Epstein b oi Billionaire financier Jeffrey 1- Epstein has been sentenced to 18 months for felony solicitat

34p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal

EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal Page 1 of 2 on this story below More from Opinion Editorials, letters, columns and more special features The Opinion Zone Sound off in our blog Share This Story The agreement thus placed the Department of Justice in a role similar to those of the four women who procured girls for Epstein. If there's a precedent in this or any of the other 92 United States attorney's offices, we'd like to hear it. Not surprisingly, R. Alexander Acosta also agreed not to prosecute those women. PalmBeachPost.com EDITORIAL: Sleazy perp, sleazier deal Palm Beach Post Editorial Tuesday, September 22, 2009 €u PRINTTHIS On the second page of the secret deal between federal prosecutors and Jeffrey Epstein, we read that the agreement will serve the interests of "the United States, the State of Florida, and the Defendant." Wrong on the first two, right on the third. Until Friday, the public didn't know the terms of the deal that finalized the case of t

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

:%W OFFICE

:%W OFFICE • Olier,leittea/di • A N I) ASSOCIATES July 3, 2008 United States Attorney's Office Dear VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7007 2680 0002 5519 8503 As you are aware, we represent several of the young girls that were victimized and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate for a sexual predator of this magnitude. The information and evidence that has come to our attention in this matter leads to a grave concern that justice will not be served in this cause if Mr. Epstein is not aggressively prosecuted and appropriately punished. Based on our investigation and knowledge of this case, it is apparent that he has sexually abused more than 100 underage girls, and the evidence against him is overwhelmingly strong. As former Assistant State Attorneys with seven years' prosecution experience, we believe that the evidence against Mr.

549p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08•cv-80736•KAM Document 190 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 3

Case 9:08•cv-80736•KAM Document 190 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE NI and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by D.C. JUN 1 8 2013 STEVEN M LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT S 0 of FLA - W PB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: I. The petitioners' protective motion seeking recognition of the availability of various remedies attaching to the CVRA violations alleged in this proceeding [DE 128] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew the request for any particular form of relief or remedy in connection with the court's fmal disposition of petitioners' CVRA petition on the merits. 2. The intervenors' motion to strike the petitioners' supplemental authority regarding privilege claims [DE 177] is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The petitioners' sealed motion for the co

51p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.