Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212560DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Emailing: Response re Motn to Unseal.wpd

From: To: Cc: Subject: Emailing: Response re Motn to Unseal.wpd Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:23:41 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Response_re_Motn_to_Unseal.wpd This is the response to the motion to unseal. I am still waiting to hear back from on their position. it cites the same cases that you see in my response to the Motion to Accept Facts as True (the 6(e) and Due Process cases). I am asking the Court not to unseal everything, but, instead, to allow us to file redacted versions of the pleading and exhibits. I will not be redacting much. In their statement of undisputed facts, the only things I would redact are the references to the FBI in paragraphs 4, and 5. The mention of "his sexual assaults of more than 30 minor girls" in paragraph 9. Paragraph 11. And paragraphs 52 and 53 (re The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Response re Moth to Unseal.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent send

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212560
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Cc: Subject: Emailing: Response re Motn to Unseal.wpd Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:23:41 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Response_re_Motn_to_Unseal.wpd This is the response to the motion to unseal. I am still waiting to hear back from on their position. it cites the same cases that you see in my response to the Motion to Accept Facts as True (the 6(e) and Due Process cases). I am asking the Court not to unseal everything, but, instead, to allow us to file redacted versions of the pleading and exhibits. I will not be redacting much. In their statement of undisputed facts, the only things I would redact are the references to the FBI in paragraphs 4, and 5. The mention of "his sexual assaults of more than 30 minor girls" in paragraph 9. Paragraph 11. And paragraphs 52 and 53 (re The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Response re Moth to Unseal.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent send

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: Emailing: Response re Motn to Unseal.wpd Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:23:41 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Response_re_Motn_to_Unseal.wpd This is the response to the motion to unseal. I am still waiting to hear back from on their position. it cites the same cases that you see in my response to the Motion to Accept Facts as True (the 6(e) and Due Process cases). I am asking the Court not to unseal everything, but, instead, to allow us to file redacted versions of the pleading and exhibits. I will not be redacting much. In their statement of undisputed facts, the only things I would redact are the references to the FBI in paragraphs 4, and 5. The mention of "his sexual assaults of more than 30 minor girls" in paragraph 9. Paragraph 11. And paragraphs 52 and 53 (re The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Response re Moth to Unseal.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. EFTA00212560

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferences

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.