Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212569DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN EXCESS OF TWENTY PAGES Respondent, United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Motion for Leave of Court to File Memorandum of Law in Excess of Twenty Pages, and states: I. Under S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(c)(2), no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding twenty (20) pages in length, absent prior permission of the Court. 2. Respondent has prepared its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, which numbers fifty-three (53) pages. A copy is attached as Exhibit A. The additional length of the Response was necessary to adequate

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212569
Pages
3
Persons
4
Integrity

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN EXCESS OF TWENTY PAGES Respondent, United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Motion for Leave of Court to File Memorandum of Law in Excess of Twenty Pages, and states: I. Under S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(c)(2), no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding twenty (20) pages in length, absent prior permission of the Court. 2. Respondent has prepared its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, which numbers fifty-three (53) pages. A copy is attached as Exhibit A. The additional length of the Response was necessary to adequate

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN EXCESS OF TWENTY PAGES Respondent, United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Motion for Leave of Court to File Memorandum of Law in Excess of Twenty Pages, and states: I. Under S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(c)(2), no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding twenty (20) pages in length, absent prior permission of the Court. 2. Respondent has prepared its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, which numbers fifty-three (53) pages. A copy is attached as Exhibit A. The additional length of the Response was necessary to adequately respond to the forty-two (42) page motion filed by petitioners. 3. On April 7, 2011, the undersigned asked petitioners' co-counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., for their position on the instant motion. Mr. Edwards graciously did not oppose the instant motion. WHEREFORE, respondent respectfully requests leave of the Court to file its Response to EFTA00212569 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 2 of 3 Jane Does #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, numbering fifty-three (53) pages. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/ Dexter A. Lee DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney Fla. Bar No. 0936693 99 N.E. 4ih Street Miami, Florida 33132 (305) 961-9320 Fax: (305) 530-7139 E-mail: dexterlee@usdoj.gov Attorney for Respondent CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 7, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. s/ Dexter A. Lee DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney 2 EFTA00212570 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 3 of 3 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 21. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 E-mail: brad@pathtojustice.com Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: casselp@law.utah.edu Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 3 EFTA00212571

Technical Artifacts (13)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM
Emailbrad@pathtojustice.com
Emailcasselp@law.utah.edu
Emaildexterlee@usdoj.gov
FaxFax: (305) 530-7139
FaxFax: (801) 585-6833
FaxFax: (954) 524-2822
Phone(305) 530-7139
Phone(305) 961-9320
Phone(801) 585-5202
Phone(801) 585-6833
Phone(954) 524-2820
Phone(954) 524-2822

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. PARTIES' CONFIDENTIAL JOINT STATUS REPORT The parties, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby file this joint status report on the state of settlement negotiations. In support thereof, the parties state: 1. On May 23, 2016, the parties appeared before the Hon. Dave Lee Brannon for a settlement conference (DE392). Progress was made towards settlement, and it was agreed that the parties would continue working on their own towards settlement and re-convene for a second settlement conference on June 28, 2016 (id.). In accordance with that schedule, U.S. Magistrate Judge Brannon ordered the parties to file a joint status report by noon on June 24, 2016 (DE393), which was later continued to noon on July 1, 2016 (DE395). 2. The parties have continued to discuss the matter and progress continues t

3p
Court UnsealedFeb 21, 2019

Jane Doe 1 & Jane 2 vs. USA

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's

33p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections

26p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE #3 AND JANE DOE #4'S CORRECTED MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR JOINDER IN ACTION Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's Correction Motion pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action (D.E. 280), and states: I. PETITIONERS' MOTION TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL PARTIES SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY This action was commenced by Jane Doe #1 on July 7, 2008 (D.E. 1). The Court ordered the Government to file a response by July 9, 2008, which was done. On July 11, 2008, the Court held a hearing on the emergency petition. At that hearing, Jane Doe #2 was added to the petition. Now, over six years into the litigation, petitioners want to add two new petitioners. Petitioners' motion should be denied becaus

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, responds to petitioners' Supplemental Request for Production to the Government Regarding Co- Conspirator Immunity Provision and Related Subjects, and states: Supplemental Discovery Request 1 (a) The September 3, 2008 Notification of Identified Victim, addressed to Jane Doe No. 3, is attached. Bates number 000911-000913, and 000918-000921. (b) No crime victim notifications were sent to Jane Doe No. 4 because the respondent was not aware of her existence until it received the August 20, 2014 letter from petitioners' counsel, Brad Edwards. (c) See Bates numbers 000670-000965, and 000966-000979. Also, the USAO-SDFL has thirty (30) draft lette

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.