Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212701DOJ Data Set 9

To: "Paul assell" <

Other

Fro To: "Paul assell" < >, "Brad Edwards" < Cc: Subject: RE: Where Do We Stand on the Proposed Statement of Facts? Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:17:09 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, I had envisioned this meeting to be an opportunity for the parties to meet face-to-face, discuss each side's objectives in the litigation, and determine whether each side could reach an accommodation. Any or all of your clients are welcome to attend the meeting. I do not believe it necessary for the parties to have an agreed set of facts in order to have a productive meeting. Nonetheless, if you believe that a necessary precondition to a meeting is an agreed statement of facts, we will do our best to accommodate you. Completing the task before November 16 will be ambitious. I will return from South Carolina on the evenin of November 10. will return from annual leave on Saturday, November 13. I will nee' assistance in order to determine if the government can agree to the facts you ass

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212701
Pages
3
Persons
4
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.