Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212710DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "

From: " To: "Paul Cassell" < >, "Brad Edwards" < Cc: " Subject: Request for Investigation Of Jeffrey Epstein Prosecution Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:08 +0000 Importance: Normal Brad and Paul, We enjoyed meeting in person with you and last Friday. I wanted to update you on the matters we discussed that day. First, Paul's request for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution has been referred to the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. OPR is the component within the DOJ which investigates allegations of misconduct relating to the authority of DO1 attorneys to investigate, litigate, and give legal advice. The December 10, 2010 letter asks this office "to investigate through appropriate and independent channels the handling of the Epstein (non)prosecution." OPR is the appropriate and independent body within the DOJ to investigate and determine whether misconduct has occurred. Second, during the meeting on December 10, we advised you

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212710
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From: " To: "Paul Cassell" < >, "Brad Edwards" < Cc: " Subject: Request for Investigation Of Jeffrey Epstein Prosecution Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:08 +0000 Importance: Normal Brad and Paul, We enjoyed meeting in person with you and last Friday. I wanted to update you on the matters we discussed that day. First, Paul's request for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution has been referred to the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. OPR is the component within the DOJ which investigates allegations of misconduct relating to the authority of DO1 attorneys to investigate, litigate, and give legal advice. The December 10, 2010 letter asks this office "to investigate through appropriate and independent channels the handling of the Epstein (non)prosecution." OPR is the appropriate and independent body within the DOJ to investigate and determine whether misconduct has occurred. Second, during the meeting on December 10, we advised you

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " To: "Paul Cassell" < >, "Brad Edwards" < Cc: " Subject: Request for Investigation Of Jeffrey Epstein Prosecution Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:08 +0000 Importance: Normal Brad and Paul, We enjoyed meeting in person with you and last Friday. I wanted to update you on the matters we discussed that day. First, Paul's request for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution has been referred to the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. OPR is the component within the DOJ which investigates allegations of misconduct relating to the authority of DO1 attorneys to investigate, litigate, and give legal advice. The December 10, 2010 letter asks this office "to investigate through appropriate and independent channels the handling of the Epstein (non)prosecution." OPR is the appropriate and independent body within the DOJ to investigate and determine whether misconduct has occurred. Second, during the meeting on December 10, we advised you of the ethical standards applicable regarding a potential prosecution of Epstein by our office, and that a recusal would likely ensue. Given your request for an investigation of this Office's conduct in the Jeffrey Epstein case, and the referral of that request to OPR, we are seeking guidance from DOJ on whether this office can continue to defend the Crime Victim Rights Act case. Third, we discussed the sequence in the litigation. You asked us that, in the event the court decides that the CVRA applied, in the absence of a formal charge, that the government concede (1) the U.S. Attorney's Office failed to comply with the CVRA; and (2) the district court should set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement. In light of what has occurred, we cannot give you an answer on those two points. You had told us earlier that you would be filing a dispositive motion by December 17, 2010. I expect to find out whether our office needs to recuse itself within the next week. I will be on leave from December 17-28, but will be back at the office on December 29. I am asking if you would defer filing any motion until after I return on December 29. Thank you. I can be reached by e-mail and cell phone, during my annual leave. EFTA00212710

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 92 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 22

22p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - RISHI SUNAK INVESTIGATION!! CASE REF: ZA52784 Re: Rishi Sunak Re: TRUMP SOS Re: Thank you

From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - RISHI SUNAK INVESTIGATION!! CASE REF: ZA52784 Re: Rishi Sunak Re: TRUMP SOS Re: Thank you to the Oz Police for confirming ! Emotional Blackmail Re: Sunday School? : Mike Baker and Emily Steel NY Timm Re: Gayle King Re: Naughty Brad and Daniel Bates Re: Theme Tune J1 Song For Funeral Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:49:22 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: IMG_6895.jpeg Hi President Trump, The Securities Exchange and the FCA Please can you investigate Rishi Sunak and his financials including California! Also please can you get everything and all correspondence from Rishi Sunaks office (ie George). The case number is ZA52784 as in the screen shot. Why would Rishi sunak want all his emails deleted if my server? Mmmmmm! Please can you investigate this for me President Trump because this could have all been resolved in 2022!! I've suffered enough!! EFTA00144040 07:49 sic I St S R <® Arrest Sent: 4 Argil 2022 10: To: SUNAK. Rishi S

42p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.