Subject: Jeffrey Epstein
From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:44:48 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Jane_Doe_DE214-4.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214_re_Motn_Protective_0rder.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-1.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-2.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-3.pdf Good afternoon, everyone. This is an FYI email regarding potential press coverage. All of the Epstein civil suits have been settled and the cases are supposed to be closed, but this came to me through CM/ECF today. It is a motion by Epstein to keep one of the plaintiff's lawyers (Brad Edwards) from disclosing documents he received through the discovery process. The specific discovery that they are trying to keep confidential is the correspondence between Epstein's attorneys and the U.S. Attorney's Office related to the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. According to the pleading and attachments, Edwards plans to use the documents: (I) to rejuvenate the victim's rights suit that he filed against our Office a few years ago; (2) to
Summary
From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:44:48 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Jane_Doe_DE214-4.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214_re_Motn_Protective_0rder.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-1.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-2.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-3.pdf Good afternoon, everyone. This is an FYI email regarding potential press coverage. All of the Epstein civil suits have been settled and the cases are supposed to be closed, but this came to me through CM/ECF today. It is a motion by Epstein to keep one of the plaintiff's lawyers (Brad Edwards) from disclosing documents he received through the discovery process. The specific discovery that they are trying to keep confidential is the correspondence between Epstein's attorneys and the U.S. Attorney's Office related to the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. According to the pleading and attachments, Edwards plans to use the documents: (I) to rejuvenate the victim's rights suit that he filed against our Office a few years ago; (2) to
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid DOJ Oversight Questions
The passage reveals that a federal prosecutor's office recused itself from the high‑profile Epstein victims’ rights case and notes a pending DOJ review prompted by Senate questioning of AG nominee Wil Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims’ rights case. The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nominee Will
Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid Calls for DOJ Review
The passage reveals a recusal by a federal prosecutor in the high‑profile Epstein case and notes that AG nominee William Barr was pressed to investigate DOJ handling. This provides a concrete lead—rec Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in early The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nom
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on F LSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION Case No. 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS WITH INTEGRATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to a Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Documentation files this his Motion for Protective Order and Objection to Disclosure of Certain Correspondence and Discovery for the reasons set forth below: I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT During the underlying litigation, Epstein vigorously sought protection from the Court that these and other documents produced would be used for purposes other than those contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for discovery; i.e., dissemination in the
- Not an Official Document
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.