Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00214034DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Thomas Scott" <

From: "Thomas Scott" < t@csklegal.com> To: c l.> Subject: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:22:43 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear M: As I mentioned in m earlier emails to you and to Deputy Associate Attorney General David Margolis, I represent AUSA in connection with the Office of Professional Responsibility's investigation of her in the matter of United States v. Adam McDaniel. My understanding is that, on October 5, 2010, United States Attorney Wifredo Ferrer appealed to DAAG Margolis OPR's recommendation that a finding of misconduct be made and also OPR's recommended sanctions. From speaking with DAAG Margolis, I understand that he referred the matter to you for review. I am writing to determine the status of your review, and also to ask whether you would permit AUSA and I to make a presentation to you regarding why we believe that OPR's recommendations are erroneous. Although we requested the opportunity to make such a presentation to U.S. Attorney Ferrer, he determined that

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00214034
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: "Thomas Scott" < t@csklegal.com> To: c l.> Subject: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:22:43 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear M: As I mentioned in m earlier emails to you and to Deputy Associate Attorney General David Margolis, I represent AUSA in connection with the Office of Professional Responsibility's investigation of her in the matter of United States v. Adam McDaniel. My understanding is that, on October 5, 2010, United States Attorney Wifredo Ferrer appealed to DAAG Margolis OPR's recommendation that a finding of misconduct be made and also OPR's recommended sanctions. From speaking with DAAG Margolis, I understand that he referred the matter to you for review. I am writing to determine the status of your review, and also to ask whether you would permit AUSA and I to make a presentation to you regarding why we believe that OPR's recommendations are erroneous. Although we requested the opportunity to make such a presentation to U.S. Attorney Ferrer, he determined that

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Thomas Scott" < t@csklegal.com> To: c l.> Subject: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:22:43 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear M: As I mentioned in m earlier emails to you and to Deputy Associate Attorney General David Margolis, I represent AUSA in connection with the Office of Professional Responsibility's investigation of her in the matter of United States v. Adam McDaniel. My understanding is that, on October 5, 2010, United States Attorney Wifredo Ferrer appealed to DAAG Margolis OPR's recommendation that a finding of misconduct be made and also OPR's recommended sanctions. From speaking with DAAG Margolis, I understand that he referred the matter to you for review. I am writing to determine the status of your review, and also to ask whether you would permit AUSA and I to make a presentation to you regarding why we believe that OPR's recommendations are erroneous. Although we requested the opportunity to make such a presentation to U.S. Attorney Ferrer, he determined that such a presentation was not necessary in deciding to appeal OPR's recommendations; thus, AUSA has yet to present her position to a reviewing official. It is our understanding that DAAG Margolis has set a short time frame for review of OPR decisions once they have left the U.S. Attorney's Office, and we do not want to forego the opportunity to present our position if you believe it would assist you in making your decision. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Thomas E. Scott EFTA00214034

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailt@csklegal.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.