Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00214091DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: Review of Jay Lefkowitz's Tome re Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Review of Jay Lefkowitz's Tome re Epstein Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:41:12 +0000 Importance: Normal 'Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" "I wish to reiterate our firm belief that the NPA allowed Mr. Epstein the right to contest litigation whenever an express waiver of all other state, federal or common law claims or the right to bring contested litigation in the future was not sufficiently or correctly pleaded. ... More is required of a plaintiff than to simply allege, as did Jane Doe 101, that she `exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 USC 2255.' Such an averment satisfies only the exclusivity portion of the twin conditions set forth in the NPA. Jane Doe 101 did no more than restate that her complaint ... was only for 2255 damages. She never affirmatively waived all future claims in state or federal court, as required by the NPA." Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33394 From

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00214091
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Subject: RE: Review of Jay Lefkowitz's Tome re Epstein Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:41:12 +0000 Importance: Normal 'Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" "I wish to reiterate our firm belief that the NPA allowed Mr. Epstein the right to contest litigation whenever an express waiver of all other state, federal or common law claims or the right to bring contested litigation in the future was not sufficiently or correctly pleaded. ... More is required of a plaintiff than to simply allege, as did Jane Doe 101, that she `exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 USC 2255.' Such an averment satisfies only the exclusivity portion of the twin conditions set forth in the NPA. Jane Doe 101 did no more than restate that her complaint ... was only for 2255 damages. She never affirmatively waived all future claims in state or federal court, as required by the NPA." Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33394 From

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: RE: Review of Jay Lefkowitz's Tome re Epstein Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:41:12 +0000 Importance: Normal 'Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" "I wish to reiterate our firm belief that the NPA allowed Mr. Epstein the right to contest litigation whenever an express waiver of all other state, federal or common law claims or the right to bring contested litigation in the future was not sufficiently or correctly pleaded. ... More is required of a plaintiff than to simply allege, as did Jane Doe 101, that she `exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 USC 2255.' Such an averment satisfies only the exclusivity portion of the twin conditions set forth in the NPA. Jane Doe 101 did no more than restate that her complaint ... was only for 2255 damages. She never affirmatively waived all future claims in state or federal court, as required by the NPA." Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33394 From Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:25 AM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Review of Jay Lefkowitz's Tome re Epstein Well, we certainly aren't going to start having meetings about what constitutes a breach. To get a flavor, can you tell me what he says about the last breach. I'm quite sure Alex didn't send him a letter on that issue. From: Sent: a nes ay, une , : M To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Subject: Review of Jay Lefl<owitz's Tome re Epstein Hi all — I went through Jay's tome. It is mostly a rebuttal of our earlier letter listing all of the prior breaches. He then attaches all of Alex's ameliorating letters as "proof' that there were no breaches because we never indicted him earlier. I do not know if a point-by-point response is required, but I am inclined to send a letter saying that he has misconstrued our efforts to act in good faith and to bend over backwards to alleviate any possible perception by Mr. Epstein that he was being singled out for harsh treatment. Jay's cover letter again asks to have a discussion regarding what does and does not breach the Non-Pros Agreement. The two issues he seems especially concerned with are: (1) wanting to raise a statute of limitations defense; and (2) being able to litigate the plaintiffs' claims that they are entitled to a floor of $50,000 or $150,000 EFTA00214091 for each "occurrence." You know that I am disinclined to talk to him because anything we say will be misquoted and used against us, but I also know that not talking to him will also be twisted and used against us. So, how would you like me to proceed? Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 EFTA00214092

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA00725792

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40

446p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

DOJ fax cover sheet referencing Jeffrey Epstein sent to former White House counsel Jay Lefkowitz (Nov 5, 2007)

The document is a routine fax cover sheet containing no substantive allegations, details, or transactions. It merely indicates that privileged material concerning Jeffrey Epstein was transmitted to Ja Date and sender: U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida, Nov 5, 2007 Recipient: Jay Lefkowitz, former White House counsel Subject line explicitly mentions Jeffrey Epstein

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: draft letter to DAG I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Airs: Assistant LAS Auorney 99N.& eth Street Aftam: Ft 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL EXPRESS June 2, 2008 Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein is a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors. In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. Marie Villafana of our West Palm Beach b

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.