Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00214946DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USAFLS)"

From: " <= 1MIE> To: (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: McDaniel Order and JE Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:08:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Hey =, I have had trouble digesting the Order put forth by Judge Zloch. I feel he is greatly mistaken and I hope you know and realize that his judgment on the facts of this case as well as the judgment he has made regarding yourself and the USAO is wrong. Please letMand I know if there is anything we can do. I have not contacted anymore of the Jane Does (other than Jane Doe #13 & #14). I asked that the two of them not speak with anyone re the information shared with them until they hear back from me. Since I have not heard anything re the naming of the Civil Atty, I am assuming there are still a few hurdles to overcome. I am not going to speak with any of the other Jane Does until we get a little closer to the State Hearing and have named a Guardian Ad Litem. We have identified another underage victim and I will be completing her interview today. I t

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00214946
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: " <= 1MIE> To: (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: McDaniel Order and JE Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:08:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Hey =, I have had trouble digesting the Order put forth by Judge Zloch. I feel he is greatly mistaken and I hope you know and realize that his judgment on the facts of this case as well as the judgment he has made regarding yourself and the USAO is wrong. Please letMand I know if there is anything we can do. I have not contacted anymore of the Jane Does (other than Jane Doe #13 & #14). I asked that the two of them not speak with anyone re the information shared with them until they hear back from me. Since I have not heard anything re the naming of the Civil Atty, I am assuming there are still a few hurdles to overcome. I am not going to speak with any of the other Jane Does until we get a little closer to the State Hearing and have named a Guardian Ad Litem. We have identified another underage victim and I will be completing her interview today. I t

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " <= 1MIE> To: (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: McDaniel Order and JE Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:08:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Hey =, I have had trouble digesting the Order put forth by Judge Zloch. I feel he is greatly mistaken and I hope you know and realize that his judgment on the facts of this case as well as the judgment he has made regarding yourself and the USAO is wrong. Please letMand I know if there is anything we can do. I have not contacted anymore of the Jane Does (other than Jane Doe #13 & #14). I asked that the two of them not speak with anyone re the information shared with them until they hear back from me. Since I have not heard anything re the naming of the Civil Atty, I am assuming there are still a few hurdles to overcome. I am not going to speak with any of the other Jane Does until we get a little closer to the State Hearing and have named a Guardian Ad Litem. We have identified another underage victim and I will be completing her interview today. I think that will bring the number to 27 or 28. is out the rest of this week. I will continue to try and find the two victims that we believe are residing out of state. Please let me know as soon as possible if you have any reason to doubt that the non-prosecution agreement is not going to be adhered to by Epstein and his legal team. We are thinking of you and hope that you are doing well. No need to respond to this email, I was just giving you an FYI. Oh, re the article in yesterday's NY Post. Our higher ups have been informed and a recommendation has been made to reiterate the FBI's position with the USAO that Epstein registering as a sex offender is non negotiable. Hopefully the United States Attorney has deaf ears when it comes to Epstein's legal team and refuses to compromise any further. Jane Doe #14 asked me why JE was receiving such a lite jail sentence and Jane Doe #13 has asked for our Victim Witness coordinator to get in touch with her so she can receive some much needed Professional counseling. Other than that, their response was filled with emotion and grateful to the Federal authorities for pursuing justice and not giving up. Take care and will speak soon. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda October 09 2007 9:23 AM To: Subject: McDaniel Order Well, he managed to make me look even worse. <<McDaniel Order. > EFTA00214946

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 1 of 7

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.