Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215270DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Ja Lefkowitz

From: Ja Lefkowitz To: Subject: RE: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:09:03 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Agreement_updated.doc.rtf Confidential -- For Settlement purposes only. - Please look this over and let's see if we can identify any issues that we need to discuss in greater detail. Since you can't go to only one count of obstruction, but 18 would become about 15 with gain time, I have made a proposal of a total 24 month sentence based on two informations. This would include a period of home detention. We can then follow this with a state lea as well so he serves the additional time there. I need to see your language for proffers on the two charges - (taking out of the jurisdiction to avoid process.) Alternatively, at this stage, we could have just one count for 12 months and then 6 months incarceration under the state, followed by community control and probabtion. I am not sure which is more practicable. Please let me know when you are free to spea

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215270
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: Ja Lefkowitz To: Subject: RE: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:09:03 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Agreement_updated.doc.rtf Confidential -- For Settlement purposes only. - Please look this over and let's see if we can identify any issues that we need to discuss in greater detail. Since you can't go to only one count of obstruction, but 18 would become about 15 with gain time, I have made a proposal of a total 24 month sentence based on two informations. This would include a period of home detention. We can then follow this with a state lea as well so he serves the additional time there. I need to see your language for proffers on the two charges - (taking out of the jurisdiction to avoid process.) Alternatively, at this stage, we could have just one count for 12 months and then 6 months incarceration under the state, followed by community control and probabtion. I am not sure which is more practicable. Please let me know when you are free to spea

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Ja Lefkowitz To: Subject: RE: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:09:03 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Agreement_updated.doc.rtf Confidential -- For Settlement purposes only. - Please look this over and let's see if we can identify any issues that we need to discuss in greater detail. Since you can't go to only one count of obstruction, but 18 would become about 15 with gain time, I have made a proposal of a total 24 month sentence based on two informations. This would include a period of home detention. We can then follow this with a state lea as well so he serves the additional time there. I need to see your language for proffers on the two charges - (taking out of the jurisdiction to avoid process.) Alternatively, at this stage, we could have just one count for 12 months and then 6 months incarceration under the state, followed by community control and probabtion. I am not sure which is more practicable. Please let me know when you are free to speak. Thanks -- Jay 09118:2007 09:14 MI To "Jay Letkowite cc Subject RE: Draft Agreements? Hi Jay - I know that the U.S. Attorney will not go below 18 months of prison/jail time (and I would strongly oppose the suggestion). From: Jay Lefkowitz Sent: Tuesda Se tember 18 2007 8:59 AM To: Subject: Re: Draft Agreements? an alternative to what we discussed just now might be to plead to one count of 1512, serve 12 months plus supervised release which would be one year of home detention (if we can make that work), followed by two years of probation in the state on the EFTA00215270 state charges with the first 6 months being community control. 09/18/2007 08:44 AM To 'Jay Lefkowitf CLefkowazialtirkland.com> cc Subject Draft Agreements? Hi Jay — I was hoping there would be things for me to read this morning, but I will try to remain patient. I believe there are only two types of agreements that would apply to this case: (1) a plea agreement to a federal charge or charges; and (2) a non-prosecution agreement (which is really a deferred prosecution agreement because the defendant agrees that if he violates the agreement, the U.S. can prosecute him). A plea agreement is part of the court file. It is not accessible on-line via PACER, but someone can go to the Clerk's Office to obtain a copy. A non-prosecution agreement would not be made public or filed with the Court, but it would remain part of our case file. It probably would be subject to a FOIA request, but it is not something that we would distribute without compulsory process. On the obstruction charges, many of the fa in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our discussions and the agents' observations of We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something more recent related to any grand jury subpoenas, we could consider that. Hope that helps. Assistant U.S. Attorney West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00215271

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainclefkowazialtirkland.com

Related Documents (6)

House OversightEmailUnknown

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and ag...

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and agreements related to Mr. Epstein's case, including a plea agreement and non-prosecution agreement, and the need for factual basis to support the charges.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: jeffrey epstein

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Epstein

Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:26:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Signed_Plea_Agreement.pdf; Final_Addendum.pdf Here is the signed agreement and an addendum. Please note that it has a confidentiality clause. Thanks. SEMI Subject: Re: Epstein Ok thx. Would you send me your last proposed nonpros with them with the 2255 language? Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:48:48 2007 Subject: FW: Epstein This is the first that I have heard about another attempt to meet with someone in Washington. I thought I would give you a heads up. Hope all is well, Andy. EFTA00214817 Subject: Fw: Epstein Can u send Jay the proposed letter and redact the names? Thx, Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz <JLefkowitz@kirkland.com> Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:29:09 2007 Subject: Re: Epstein I received your email yesterday and was a little surprised at the tone of your letter, given the fact that we spoke last week and had what I thought was a prod

4p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01729176

0p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.