UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. PROTECTIVE ORDER Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (the "victims"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, and the Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, enter into the following protective order: 1. The United States will promptly produce to counsel for the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, the complete, unredacted Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein and any and all addenda, memoranda of understanding, or similar documents that bear on the enforceability and meaning of the Agreement. At a minimum, this will include any executed Agreement from September 2007 and all accompanying addenda, and addenda to the Agreement from October 2007, and a letter bearing on the interpretation of the Agreement fr
Summary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. PROTECTIVE ORDER Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (the "victims"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, and the Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, enter into the following protective order: 1. The United States will promptly produce to counsel for the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, the complete, unredacted Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein and any and all addenda, memoranda of understanding, or similar documents that bear on the enforceability and meaning of the Agreement. At a minimum, this will include any executed Agreement from September 2007 and all accompanying addenda, and addenda to the Agreement from October 2007, and a letter bearing on the interpretation of the Agreement fr
Persons Referenced (4)
“...HERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. PROTECTIVE ORDER Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and ...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...e complete, unredacted Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein and any and all addenda, memoranda of understanding, or similar documents that bear on the enforceabili...”
Bradley EdwardsTags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA02726140
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire
EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.