Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215533DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "

From: " (USAFL5)" </O=USNOU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN. To: " > Subject: Conversation with Mike Tein Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:52:55 +0000 Importance: Normal Mike Tein called this afternoon, wanting to confirm details he had read in the newspaper. I told him that Judge Marra had not dismissed the victims' petition, and explained the parties were determining whether an evidentiary hearing was necessary. He asked if both Jane Doe No. 1 and No. 2 were present in court, and I told him yes. He also asked if the government's response would be available on PACER. I told him that, since the court had denied our motion to seal, the government's response would be unsealed and placed on the docket. EFTA00215533

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215533
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: " (USAFL5)" </O=USNOU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN. To: " > Subject: Conversation with Mike Tein Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:52:55 +0000 Importance: Normal Mike Tein called this afternoon, wanting to confirm details he had read in the newspaper. I told him that Judge Marra had not dismissed the victims' petition, and explained the parties were determining whether an evidentiary hearing was necessary. He asked if both Jane Doe No. 1 and No. 2 were present in court, and I told him yes. He also asked if the government's response would be available on PACER. I told him that, since the court had denied our motion to seal, the government's response would be unsealed and placed on the docket. EFTA00215533

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " (USAFL5)" </O=USNOU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN. To: " > Subject: Conversation with Mike Tein Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:52:55 +0000 Importance: Normal Mike Tein called this afternoon, wanting to confirm details he had read in the newspaper. I told him that Judge Marra had not dismissed the victims' petition, and explained the parties were determining whether an evidentiary hearing was necessary. He asked if both Jane Doe No. 1 and No. 2 were present in court, and I told him yes. He also asked if the government's response would be available on PACER. I told him that, since the court had denied our motion to seal, the government's response would be unsealed and placed on the docket. EFTA00215533

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.