Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215601DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News

From: To: Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:30:59 +0000 Importance: Normal The motion has been taken under advisement. The parties are conferring to determine if an evidentiary hearing is necessary. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:25 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Perfect — I will forward to her. So, in a nutshell, what was the result of the hearing on Friday? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:24 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Here is the scanned file-stamped copies of our filings. Along with the filings of the Jane Does from PACER. « File: DE2_080707_Cert of Emergency.pdf » « File: DE1_080707_Petition.pdf » « File: DE9_080711_Reply Brief.pdf » « File: In Re Jane Doe001.pdf » From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:22 PM To: (USAFLS) EFTA002156

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215601
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:30:59 +0000 Importance: Normal The motion has been taken under advisement. The parties are conferring to determine if an evidentiary hearing is necessary. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:25 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Perfect — I will forward to her. So, in a nutshell, what was the result of the hearing on Friday? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:24 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Here is the scanned file-stamped copies of our filings. Along with the filings of the Jane Does from PACER. « File: DE2_080707_Cert of Emergency.pdf » « File: DE1_080707_Petition.pdf » « File: DE9_080711_Reply Brief.pdf » « File: In Re Jane Doe001.pdf » From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:22 PM To: (USAFLS) EFTA002156

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:30:59 +0000 Importance: Normal The motion has been taken under advisement. The parties are conferring to determine if an evidentiary hearing is necessary. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:25 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Perfect — I will forward to her. So, in a nutshell, what was the result of the hearing on Friday? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:24 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Here is the scanned file-stamped copies of our filings. Along with the filings of the Jane Does from PACER. « File: DE2_080707_Cert of Emergency.pdf » « File: DE1_080707_Petition.pdf » « File: DE9_080711_Reply Brief.pdf » « File: In Re Jane Doe001.pdf » From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:22 PM To: (USAFLS) EFTA00215601 Cc: WAILS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Ok — just got off the phone with her. Can you send me copies of the does, which I will fonvard to her? thanks,. From: USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:15 PM To: USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News I just received a phone call from Maggie Kacoha of the Palm Beach Daily News, asking about the Jane Doe case. She told me they were tied up on Friday and unable to attend the hearing before Judge Marra. She said she had read the Sun Sentinel article and wanted to confirm that : (1) the government argued the court had no jurisdiction; and (2) the district court agreed. I gave her your name and said someone would be calling her back. I told her that the filings had all been unsealed and she could access them through PACER. I did confirm that the government argued the court did not have jurisdiction, but said the case was not over. I declined to make any other comments. When the hearing concluded last Friday, Judge Marra left it up to the parties to advise the court whether an evidentiary hearing was needed. If the answer is yes, then the court will schedule a hearing. If the answer is no, then I assume the court will go ahead and rule on the papers filed. If you need copies of what the government filed, please let me know. Thanks. EFTA00215602

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11

11p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.