Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00221091DOJ Data Set 9Other

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 January 24, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE AND HAND Michael Salnick One Clearlake Centre 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1203 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5014 Re: Janusz Banasiak Dear Mr. Salnick: I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the interview with your client, Janusz Banasiak ("your client"), to occur January , 2007. As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Banasiak is not a target of this investigation. However, to address your concern about criminal exposure, if your client complies with every provision of this agreement, then the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("this Office") will treat all statements made by your client during said debriefing as statements made pursuant to Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This is not a grant of immunity, w

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00221091
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 January 24, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE AND HAND Michael Salnick One Clearlake Centre 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1203 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5014 Re: Janusz Banasiak Dear Mr. Salnick: I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the interview with your client, Janusz Banasiak ("your client"), to occur January , 2007. As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Banasiak is not a target of this investigation. However, to address your concern about criminal exposure, if your client complies with every provision of this agreement, then the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("this Office") will treat all statements made by your client during said debriefing as statements made pursuant to Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This is not a grant of immunity, w

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 January 24, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE AND HAND Michael Salnick One Clearlake Centre 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1203 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5014 Re: Janusz Banasiak Dear Mr. Salnick: I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the interview with your client, Janusz Banasiak ("your client"), to occur January , 2007. As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Banasiak is not a target of this investigation. However, to address your concern about criminal exposure, if your client complies with every provision of this agreement, then the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("this Office") will treat all statements made by your client during said debriefing as statements made pursuant to Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This is not a grant of immunity, which can be given only with approval of the Justice Department, but protects your client from having the statements made by him during the interview from being used against him directly. To guard against any misunderstandings concerning the debriefing of your client, this letter sets forth the terms of this agreement. Your client agrees to be fully interviewed, that is, to provide information concerning your client's knowledge of, and participation in criminal activity, including but not limited to the procurement of prostitutes. The protection of this letter applies to a debriefing that will be conducted by this Office, Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and any other law enforcement agency this Office may require. This agreement pertains only to the debriefing made on the date stated in the previous paragraph and to no other events. Thus, under this agreement, no information disclosed by your client during the interview will be offered in evidence against your client in any criminal or civil proceeding, provided that your client complies with this agreement and that the information your client furnishes is truthful, complete, and accurate. If, however, this Office determines that your client has intentionally given materially false, incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information, then this Office may use such information in any matter or proceeding and your client is subject to prosecution for perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to government agencies. Any such prosecution may be based upon information provided by your client during the course of the interview, and such information, including your client's statements, will be admissible against your client in any grand jury or other proceeding. The government also may use statements made by your client in any debriefing and all evidence derived directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of impeachment or cross- examination if he testifies at any trial or hearing, and/or in any rebuttal case against your client in a criminal trial in which he is a defendant or a witness. This provision is necessary to ensure that your client does not make or offer any false representation or statement in any proceeding or to a government agency or commit perjury during any testimony. EFTA00221091 Your client further agrees that attorneys for the United States may be present at the debriefing, and agrees not to seek disqualification of any such government attorney from any proceeding or trial because of their participation at the debriefing. The entire agreement between the United States and your client is set forth in this letter. No additional promises, agreements, or conditions have been entered into and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. If the foregoing accurately reflects the understanding and agreement between this Office and your client, it is requested that you and your client execute this letter as provided below. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney I have received this letter from my attorney, Michael Salnick, Esquire, have read it and discussed it with my attorney, and I hereby acknowledge that it fully sets forth my understanding and agreement with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. I state that there have been no additional promises or representations made to me by any official of the United States Government or by my attorney in connection with this matter. Dated: Janusz Banasiak Witnessed by: Michael Salnick, Esquire EFTA00221092

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

FaxFacsimile: (561) 820-8777
Phone(561) 820-8777
Phone401-5014

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01338095

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

01/19/2007 16:48

01/19/2007 16:48 5616590793 PAGE 01 SAL.NICK. FUCHS & BERTISCH, P.A. Mithael SsMick • Jack K. Fuchs Flynn P. Bertsch • Bard Cs*NW Criminal Trial Infer • member of Cant Dint d Cobans and Now York Bats Jennifer L. Shand Cared Leg& Natant MEMO (1) Page Fax: - AUSA DATE: JANUARY 19, 2007 FROM: MICHAEL SALNICK TO: — Assistant United States Attorney RE: Our Client: Janusz Banasiak Far E-mak: Thank you for speaking with me this afternoon regarding this matter. I know that during our phone conversation you indicated that my client is not a target. In the spirit of being thorough, I want to confirm that he is a witness and nothing else. When we got off the phone, I began to feel somewhat uneasy with the standard immunity letter. That is in no way a reflection on you, but more my discomfort with what protection that would really provide him. I would please request that you reconsider and offer my client a formal grant of immunity. I realize that requires a proced

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Petty cash

0 0 r i953 Petty cash - Opening balance Ending balance Date 11/29/2006 1/2/2007 Amount $1,965.43 $120.77 Date Payee Amount Description Deposit Balance 1 11/9/2006 Starbucks $7.41 Coffee $1,958.02 2 11/12/2006 Subway Sandwiches $6.16 Meal $1,951.86 3 11/13/2006 Starbucks $3.41 Coffee $1,948.45 4 11/13/2006 Hale $ Hearty $8.44 Meal $1,940.01 5 11/14/2006 Hale $ Hearty $8.44 Meal $1,931.57 6 11/14/2006 Starbucks $3.41 Coffee $1,928.16 7 11/14/2006 The Container Store $4.19 Scotch tape $1,923.97 8 11/14/2006 The Container Store $8.65 Gift labels $1,915.32 9 11/14/2006 Walgreens $7.49 Medicine $1,907.83 10 11/14/2006 Duane Reade $6.39 Medicine $1,901.44 11 11/15/2006 Hale $ Hearty $8.44 Meal $1,893.00 12 11/16/2006 Gristede's $27.94 Groceries $1,885.06 13 11/16/2006 Starbucks $3.41 Coffee $1,861.65 14 11/16/2006 Starbucks $3.41 Coffee $1,858.24 15 11/16/2006 Hale $ Hearty $8.44 Meal $1,849.80 16 11/18/2006 Hale $ Hearty $8.4

150p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01338095

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 3340! Facsimile: February 2, 2007 DELIVERY BY HAND Michael Salnick One Clearlake Centre 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1203 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5014 Re: Janusz Banasiak Dear Mr. Salnick: I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the interview with your client, Janusz Banasiak ("your client"), to occur today, February 2, 2007. As I m

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70 EXHIBIT A PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS EFTA00208682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 2 of 70 PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS Key to Objections (linking to Victims' Motion to Compel Production of Docments that Are Not Prig ileged Objection General Objections -- Inadequate Privilege Log Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim Waiver of Confidentiality Government's Fiduciary Duty to Crime Victims Bars Privilege Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not Covered Factual Materials Not Covered Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established Deliberative Process Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Qualified Privilege Ove

70p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.