Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00221647DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06(20'2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves, pursuant to S.D. Ha. L.R. 7.1(A), for an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a mandatory stay, filed contemporaneously with this motion, is decided, and as grounds for this relief respectfully states as follows: 1. This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in the Southern District of Florida. 2. These cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. 3. On June 20, 2008, Mr. Epstein filed a motion seeking a stay of this

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00221647
Pages
4
Persons
4
Integrity

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06(20'2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves, pursuant to S.D. Ha. L.R. 7.1(A), for an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a mandatory stay, filed contemporaneously with this motion, is decided, and as grounds for this relief respectfully states as follows: 1. This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in the Southern District of Florida. 2. These cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. 3. On June 20, 2008, Mr. Epstein filed a motion seeking a stay of this

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06(20'2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves, pursuant to S.D. Ha. L.R. 7.1(A), for an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a mandatory stay, filed contemporaneously with this motion, is decided, and as grounds for this relief respectfully states as follows: 1. This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in the Southern District of Florida. 2. These cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. 3. On June 20, 2008, Mr. Epstein filed a motion seeking a stay of this action under 18 U.S.C. § 3509. Under that section, when an alleged sexual assault EFTA00221647 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06(20:2008 Page 2 of 4 involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly derived civil suit "shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added). 4. If Mr. Epstein's stay motion is granted, he will not be required to respond to the Complaint or otherwise litigate this action until the two pending criminal matters are resolved. WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a stay is decided. Respectfully submitted, ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691 By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 2 EFTA00221648 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2008 Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7 Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion. /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 20, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CMJECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail. Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877 /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger 3 EFTA00221649 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2008 Page 4 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER THIS CAUSE having come to be heard on the Defendant's Motion for An Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint, and this Court being fully advised, it is hereby: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is hereby granted. DONE AND ORDERED in Miami-Dade County, Florida this day of , 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. EFTA00221650

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80119-KAM
FaxFax: 305 931 0877
FaxFax: 561 835 8691
Phone305 931 0877
Phone561 659 8300
Phone561 835 8691

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 05:19/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL LEWIS TEIN, P.L. hereby moves for leave to withdraw as co-counsel for defendant Jeffrey Epstein, stating as follows: 1. On December 30, 2008, Lewis Tein filed its notice of withdrawal as counsel for Mr. Epstein [DE 53], noting that two other law firms who previously entered their appearance on Mr. Epstein's behalf would remain as co-counsel. 2. We have since learned through discussions with the Clerk of Court that absent a formal order of withdrawal by this Court, Lewis Tein will continue to be listed as counsel for Mr. Epstein on the CM/ECF. 3. Accordingly, Lewis Tein respectfully requests that this Court enter an order allowing it to withdraw as counsel for Mr. Epstein. Lewis 'reins.

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 07 29 '2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. I JANE DOE NO. 3, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 4, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 5, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-ICAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBITS Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby files the following two exhibits to his Reply in Support of Motion to Stay, filed under seal on July 28, 2008: A. Exhibit "A" is the July 9, 2008 Declaration of Assistant United States Attorney , M previously filed by the United States in In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08- 80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14). LeaTsinri 3059 GRAND Avavue. Surn 340.COCONtri GROvE. FLORIDA 33133 EFTA00221651 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'29'2008 Page 2 of 3

3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions. Introduction This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly EFTA00221641 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 0718/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Memorandum of Law in Response to Motion for Stay, as follows: INTRODUCTION Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay this action is based on the incorrect premise that there are criminal actions pending against him in Palm Beach Circuit Court, State of Florida. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXXMB (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), and in the Southern District of Florida, In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB) (S.D. Fla.). The Motion to Stay as to the state court criminal action was rendered moot on June 30, 2008 when Jeffrey Epstein entered a plea of guilty to

9p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.